Smrt Lakkamma v. Pragathi Gramin Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition dismissed; Order 47 Rule 1 CPC; Section 114 CPC; error apparent on face of record; review not appeal in disguise; no reagitation of decided questions; change in law not ground for review; judgment dated 24.06.2024 in W.P.No.691/2023; relied on Shri Ram Sahu v. Vinod Kumar Rawat CA 3601/2020, S. Murali Sundaram v. Jothibai Kannan (2023) SCC OnLine SC 185, S. Madhusudhan Reddy v. V. Narayana Reddy CA 5503-04/2022, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal v. State Tax Officer 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1406; petitioner Smt Lakkamma; respondents Pragathi Gramin Bank, DRT Recovery Officer; S.R.Krishna Kumar J.; High Court of Karnataka; 09.03.2026.
What did the court decide?
On consideration of the entire material on record, there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and decree, nor does it suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference by this Court under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, consistent with the relied-upon Apex Court judgments.