Dismissed¶¶43

Sri. Vijayaraju v. Smt Shakunthala Madhava Rao Bhat

Karnataka HC13 Jan 2026RFA/1887/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of partition appeal: High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (NC: 2026:KHC:2251-DB) dismissed RFA No. 1887 of 2012 as withdrawn after appellant Vijayaraju, pursuant to settlement with Respondent No.9 D.M. Kishan, filed a memo for withdrawal; no adjudication on merits of the decree in O.S.No.2735/2009 (partition and separate possession, dated 14.06.2012, XXVII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore); filed u/S.96 CPC; advocates: C. Lokesh (appellant), S.N. Prashanth Chandra (R1 and R2), H.S. Somnath (R9), Murugesh V Charati (R10).

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn upon acceptance of the withdrawal memo ¶¶43

Sri. Vijayaraju Vs Smt Shakunthala Madhava Rao Bhat — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:2251-DB RFA No. 1887 of 2012

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1887 OF 2012 (INJ)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI.VIJAYARAJU, S/O LATE AGARCHAND, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT: 235/A, D.B.STREET, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 003.

¶10

&APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI.C.LOKESH, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SMT.SHAKUNTHALA MADHAVA RAO BHAT, W/O. LATE MADHAV RAO BHAT, D/O LATE.K.S.HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT: B 604, SAGAR GARDENS LBS MARG, MULUND (W), MUMBAI-400 080.

¶15

SMT. HEMALATHA SEETHARAMAIAH, W/O. SRI SEETHARAMAYYA, D/O.LATE K.S.HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT: 341, 2ND CROSS, 5TH MAIN,

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:2251-DB RFA No. 1887 of 2012

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

SADANANDA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 038.

¶19

SMT. KALPANA RAMANANDA, W/O LATE. K.S.RAMANANDA, AGED ABOAUT 61 YEARS,

¶20

SANJAY R. HEBBAR, S/O LATE K.S.RAMANANDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶21

SUNIL SRINIVAS HEBBAR S/O LATE K.S.RAMANANDA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

¶22

RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 5 ARE R/AT # 11, THEODORE DRIVE, EAST BRINSWICK, NJ 08816, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND REPRESENTED BY THEIR P.A HOLDER SRI.M.GANESH, S/O.SRI.M.KRISHNAYYA, #317, 1ST FLOOR, RANKA COURT, ULSOOR, CAMBRIDGE LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 038.

¶23

DR K.S.PRABHAKAR, S/O. LATE. K.S.HEBBAR, HINDU, MAJOR,

¶24

SMT. K.P.SUSMITHA, D/O. DR.K.S.PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

¶25

K.P.SHARATH, S/O DR.K.S.PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

¶26

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:2251-DB RFA No. 1887 of 2012

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

RESPONDENT NO.6 TO 8 ARE R/AT: #173, HEMAGIRI MEADOWS, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 083.

¶29

D.M.KISHAN, S/O D.K.MUNISWAMISA, HINDU, MAJOR, R/AT #1, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

¶30

THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

¶31

&RESPONDENTS

¶32

(BY SRI.S.N.PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 AND R8 ARE SERVED; SRI.H.S.SOMNATH ADVOCATE FOR R9; SRI.MURUGESH V CHARATI ADVOCATE FOR R10)

¶33

THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.06.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2735/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

¶34

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶35

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶36

¶37

NC: 2026:KHC:2251-DB RFA No. 1887 of 2012

¶38

HC-KAR

¶39

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶40

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

¶41

A memo for withdrawal has been filed today in Court, which is signed by the appellant, who is present in person. A photo copy of the Aadhaar Card of the appellant has also been submitted.

¶42

This memo for withdrawal has been counter signed by Sri. C. Lokesh, Advocate (Enrolment No.KAR 1413/2009), in which it is stated that, at the intervention of friends and known persons, the appellant has settled the dispute with Respondent No.9 and hence, he does not wish to proceed with the matter.

¶43

The memo is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶44

Sd/-

¶45

(JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

¶46

Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

¶47

KGR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

Sri. Vijayaraju v. Smt Shakunthala Madhava Rao Bhat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Vijayaraju v. Smt Shakunthala Madhava Rao Bhat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Ashwath Narayana C Vs Smt K Manjula

Sri. Prashanth Kumar Vs Smt. Shobha

Smt Chitra M v Vs Sri B v Babukiran

Smt Deepa S Vs Yuvaraja K

Sri K Chandrappa Vs Smt Jayamma

Sri Sathyajith Rai Vs Smt Sahana