Dismissed¶37

J.S. Bharath v. Smt. M.M Latha @ Dyna

Karnataka HC17 Mar 2026RFA/1255/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal by memo; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; amicable settlement between parties; RFA No. 1255 of 2022 (DEC); High Court of Karnataka; Section 96 CPC; OS No.8/2014 Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Sakaleshpura; suit decreed for declaration; judgment dated 05.04.2022; oral judgment by Justice Anu Sivaraman with Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeal as not pressed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. ¶37

Why is it important?

J.S. Bharath Vs Smt. M.M Latha @ Dyna — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:15812-DB RFA No. 1255 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1255 OF 2022 (DEC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. J.S. BHARATH S/O SRI LATE J. D. SOMAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O LAKSHMIPURA LAYOUT SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573 211

¶9

&APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. SUMANTH BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N 1. SMT. M.M LATHA @ DYNA Location: W/O SRI BOPANNA High Court D/O SRI LATE M K MEDAPPA

¶13

of Karnataka AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O KAIKERE VILLAGE VIRAJPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT 571 218

¶14

SMT. M M GEETHA W/O RAMESH B N D/O SRI LATE M K MEDAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

¶15

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:15812-DB RFA No. 1255 of 2022

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

R/O KOTTURU VILLAGE KOLAGADALU CHERAMBANE

¶18

KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201

¶19

SRI M M KUTTAPPA S/O SRI LATE M K MEDAPPA

¶20

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O KARAGUNDA VILLAGE KOTTURU MADIKERI TALUK

¶21

KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201

¶22

SRI M M MONAPPA @ PAPANNA S/O SRI LATE M K MEDAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/O KARAGUNDA VILLAGE KOTTURU, MADIKERI TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201

¶23

&RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR R.H., ADV. R1, R3 & R4)

¶25

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.04.2022 PASSED IN OS No.8/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPURA, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:15812-DB RFA No. 1255 of 2022

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶32

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶33

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks

¶34

leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a

¶35

memo to that effect. The memo reads as under;

¶36

"The undersigned advocate herewith prays that, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the appellant to withdraw the above said appeal as not pressed since the parties to the appeal have amicably settled the matter, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶37

In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as

¶38

withdrawn.

¶39

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶40

Sd/(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

¶41

RAK,List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16

J.S. Bharath v. Smt. M.M Latha @ Dyna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

J.S. Bharath v. Smt. M.M Latha @ Dyna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Shafeeq Ahamed Vs the Divisional Controller Ksrtc

M/S Hindusthan Steel Works Construction Limited Vs Union of India

Smt Hemavathi Vs the Joint Commissioner

The State of Karnataka Vs Karakushala Kaigarika Sahakara Sangh Ltd.

M/S Shree Electronics Vs M/S Bpl Limited

Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Vs Sri Shivappa Kuri