Dismissed¶36

Sri. Shafeeq Ahamed v. the Divisional Controller Ksrtc

Karnataka HC16 Mar 2026COMAP/8/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Commercial Appeal COMAP No. 8 of 2023; Section 13(1-A) Commercial Courts Act 2015; temporary injunction application rejected; Com.O.S. No. 46/2022; Principal District and Sessions Judge Mysuru; order dated 06.12.2022; I.A. No. 1/2022; Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysore Urban Division; Managing Director KSRTC; possession taken over; tender notification 10.12.2022; licence cancelled; W.P. No. 3577/2023 dismissed; appeal dismissed; suit to proceed and be decided in accordance with law; Anu Sivaraman J.; Tara Vitasta Ganju J.; High Court of Karnataka 16.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Having considered the contentions advanced and the submissions made on either side, the appeal is dismissed; the suit shall be proceeded with and decided in accordance with law. ¶36

Sri. Shafeeq Ahamed Vs the Divisional Controller Ksrtc — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:15250-DB COMAP No. 8 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU COMMERCIAL APPEAL No. 8 OF 2023

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. SHAFEEQ AHAMED S/O. LATE NAZIR AHAMED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT No. 41, 2^ND CROSS BANNIMANTAP C LAYOUT BANNIMANTAP MYSORE-570 015.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI RANJAN KUMAR K, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA

¶15

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC MYSORE URBAN DIVISION NELSON MANDELA ROAD BANNIMANTAP MYSORE - 570 015.

¶16

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR K.S.R.T.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, DOUBLE ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 027.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI P.D. SURANA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:15250-DB COMAP No. 8 of 2023

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1-A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN COM O.S No.46/2022 FROM FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 6.12.2022 ON IA No. 1/2022 IN COM OS No.46/2022 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU AND ETC.,

¶22

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and

¶24

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶25

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶26

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶27

This appeal is preferred against an order dated

¶28

06.12.2022 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysuru in Com.O.S. No. 46/2022 rejecting an application for temporary injunction.

¶29

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1 and 2.

¶30

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents

¶31

submits that after the I.A. was rejected, possession of the

¶32

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:15250-DB COMAP No. 8 of 2023

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

property was taken over by the respondent and a tender notification was issued on 10.12.2022. It is submitted that license had been cancelled and notice canceling the license was also challenged by the appellant in W.P. No. 3577/2023. The said writ petition was also dismissed. It is also submitted that in the above view of the matter,

¶35

nothing survives for consideration in this appeal.

¶36

Having considered the contentions advanced and the submissions made on either side, the appeal is dismissed . The suit shall be proceeded with and decided in accordance with law.

¶37

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶38

Sd/(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

¶39

LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 ct.sm

Sri. Shafeeq Ahamed v. the Divisional Controller Ksrtc

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Shafeeq Ahamed v. the Divisional Controller Ksrtc

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri C Shivanna Vs Sri B K Chandrashekar

Sri. Ravi v M Vs Sri. Purushottam Das Heggade

M/S. Tavara Mines and Minerals Vs Smt. Gunjan Krishna

Union Bank of India Vs M/S Hindusthan Steel Works

Smt Shobha Vs Sri Venkatesh

Smt Hemavathi Vs the Joint Commissioner