Dismissed¶33

Mr Venkatesh v. Mrs Chandrakala

Karnataka HC3 Jul 2026MSA/194/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; MSA/Miscellaneous Second Appeal No. 194 of 2025 (RO); Order 43 Rule 1(u) CPC; appeal withdrawn by memo; dismissed as withdrawn; appellant Venkatesh; respondents Chandrakala, Sunil, Anil, Chaitra; counsel Sri. Mohana Chandra P.; judge Ms. Justice Jyoti M; decision date 03-07-2026; no substantive holdings, no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

None; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn at the appellant's instance. ¶33

Mr Venkatesh Vs Mrs Chandrakala — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:33264 MSA No. 194 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 194 OF 2025 (RO)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, R/AT BAPUJI COLONY, KUPPE VILLAGE, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105.

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

MRS. CHANDRAKALA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O. LATE RENUKAIAH,

¶13

SUNIL,

¶14

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O. LATE RENUKAIAH,

¶16

ANIL, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O LATE RENUKAIAH,

¶17

CHAITRA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS W/O. SUNIL,

¶18

ALL ARE R/AT KUPPE VILLAGE, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DSITRICT-571105.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:33264 MSA No. 194 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(u) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.

¶24

THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Sri.Mohana Chandra P., counsel for the appellant appeared in person.

¶27

Counsel for the appellant submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the appellant submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the appeal and if an order is passed the appellant shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

The oral submission and the memo is placed on record.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:33264 MSA No. 194 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision

¶33

about the withdrawal of the appeal, the appeal is dismissed as

¶34