road accident on 30.10.2013 and later his right limb from above the knee was amputated. In order to prove the claim, the appellant examined himself as PW1 and Dr.Giridhar Kumar, as PW2, who has assessed the disability of the appellant to the extent of 85%. However, the Tribunal assessed the disability at 80%. It is submitted that the Tribunal has failed to consider the fact that PW2 has clearly deposed that due to the amputation, the appellant is unable to continue his vocation i.e., mason work, and he cannot lift the weights. Hence, the functional disability of the appellant is required to be re-assessed at 100%. It is further submitted that the Tribunal has also committed an error in assessing the income of the injured, hence, she submits that the income of the injured is required to be re-assessed notionally at Rs.8,000/- per month. It is also submitted that the appellant was inpatient for 181 days on different occasions and the Tribunal has awarded meager compensation on all the heads. It is contended that the appellant is entitled to
