Smt. Venakatamma v. Shri. M. G. Siddaramaiah

Karnataka HC23 Mar 2026WP/13819/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; W.P. No.13819/2022 (GM-CPC); Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil; decided 23.03.2026; Article 226; FDP No.6/2014; I.A. No.XIV; Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Madhugiri, Tumkur District; order dated 24.05.2022 (Annexure-H); dismissal as withdrawn; memo dated 03.03.2026; infructuous; auction; bidder withdrew amount; final decree proceedings; petitioners Venakatamma and Narasamma through LRs (Manjamma, Ramya, Chandrakala, Narasimha, Muthyalamma, Kusuma, Aparna, Girijamma) v. respondents Siddaramaiah and Nanjappa through LRs, Lal Khan family (Shabbir Sab, Shameer, Noorulla) and Anees Ahmed; advocate Nanja Reddy P.N.; no merits adjudicated; no precedent set.

What did the court decide?

None; leave to withdraw accepted and the petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioners' instance ¶61-62

Smt. Venakatamma Vs Shri. M. G. Siddaramaiah — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:16305 W.P. No.13819/2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.13819/2022 (GM-CPC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. VENAKATAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S.

¶8

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶9

a) SMT. MANJAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.

¶10

b) SMT. RAMYA D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.

¶11

c) SMT. CHANDRAKALA D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.

¶12

d) SRI. NARASIMHA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.

¶13

LR'S 1(a) TO (d) ARE R/AT MAGODU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101.

¶14

SMT. NARASAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA DEAD BY HER LR'S.

¶15

a) SMT. MUTHYALAMMA W/O LATE MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:16305 W.P. No.13819/2022

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

b) SMT. KUSUMA D/O LATE MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS.

¶19

c) SRI. NARASIMHA S/O LATE MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.

¶20

d) SMT. APARNA D/O LATE MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS.

¶21

LR'S 2(a) TO (d) ARE R/AT SHIVANAGERE VILLAGE DODDERI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT.

¶22

e) SMT. GIRIJAMMA D/O NARASAMMA AND W/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT 2ND BLOCK, DAVANGA STREET MADHUGIRI TOWN TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 101.

¶23

…PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N. ADV.,)

¶25

AND:

¶26

SHRI. M.G. SIDDARAMAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS.

¶27

a) SMT. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE M. G. SIDDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS.

¶28

b) SHRI. M.S. SADASHIVAIAH S/O LATE M.G. SIDDARAMAIAH

¶29

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:16305 W.P. No.13819/2022

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

MAJOR IN AGE.

¶32

c) SHRI. M.S. SUBRAMANYAM S/O LATE M.G. SIDDARAMAIAH MAJOR IN AGE.

¶33

d) SHRI. M.S. NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE M.G. SIDDARAMAIAH MAJOR IN AGE.

¶34

LRS. 1(a) TO (d) ARE R/AT NO.1908 B, IIND STAGE IIND MAIN ROAD 11TH CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU-560 040.

¶35

SHRI. M.G. NANJAPPA DEAD BY HIS LRS.

¶36

SMT. NAGAMANI D/O M.G. NANJAPPA W/O JAGANNATH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O. THONDEBHAVI ROAD NEAR GEETHA TALKIES MANCHENAHALLI GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-572 201.

¶37

SRI. LAL KHAN S/O LATE SUBHAN KHAN AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS.

¶38

SRI. SHABBIR SAB S/O LAL KHAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.

¶39

SRI. SHAMEER S/O LAL KHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

¶40

¶41

NC: 2026:KHC:16305 W.P. No.13819/2022

¶42

HC-KAR

¶43

SRI. NOORULLA S/O LAL KHAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶44

RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 ARE R/AT OPPOSITE TO R.M.C. YARD BASHA SAW MILL, G.B.N. ROAD MADHUGIRI TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101.

¶45

SRI. ANEES AHMED S/O P.H. NAZEER AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT HOGEBILU, 2ND BLOCK MADHUGIRI TOWN TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101.

¶46

…RESPONDENTS

¶47

(V/O/DTD:04.08.2022 NOTICE TO R1 (a - d) & R2 TO R6 ARE D/W R7 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶48

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN FDP.NO.6/2014 DTD 24.05.2022 ANNEXURE-H, I.A.NO.XIV PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MADHUGIRI, TUMKUR DISTRICT. DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS CONSEQUENT UPON QUASHING THE ORDER AT ANNEXURE-H & ETC.

¶49

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶50

¶51

NC: 2026:KHC:16305 W.P. No.13819/2022

¶52

HC-KAR

¶53

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶54

ORAL ORDER

¶55

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo

¶56

dated 03.03.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw

¶57

the petition.

¶58

Memo reads as under:

¶59

"The petitioners above named prays that the above case may be permitted with draw as the bidder before the trial court withdrawn the amount and the trial court further auctioned and hence the above case has become infructuous."

¶60

Memo is placed on record.

¶61

In view of the aforesaid memo, petition is

¶62

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶63

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶64

BSR

¶65

List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1

Smt. Venakatamma v. Shri. M. G. Siddaramaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Venakatamma v. Shri. M. G. Siddaramaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Chitthamma Vs Thammanna

Sri Nagappa N G Vs Secretary

Ravi G.K. Vs Smt.Parameshwari Amma

Sri. Syed Aslam Vs Sri. M S Dinesh

H R Lingaraju Vs Rajesh C a

Sri Prakash Shetty Vs Robert Putado