Dismissed¶33

Rajput Samaj(Karnataka) v. Sri Lalchand D Jain

Karnataka HC11 Mar 2026MFA/7369/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajput Samaj (Karnataka) rep. by Manohar Singh Rathore v. Sri Lalchand D Jain and Sri Ritesh Kumar L Jain; MFA No. 7369 of 2023 (CPC); High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Justice K.S. Hemalekha; decided 11-03-2026; appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC against order dated 20.09.2023 in O.S. No. 4044/2023 (24th Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City, C.C.H.No.6) rejecting I.A. No.1 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC; disposed of on joint memo recording amicable settlement through intervention of elders; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no merits or issues adjudicated; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

The joint memo filed by learned counsels for both parties, recording amicable resolution of the dispute and agreement to withdraw the appeal, was taken on record. ¶29

Rajput Samaj(Karnataka) Vs Sri Lalchand D Jain — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:14511 MFA No. 7369 of 2023

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7369 OF 2023 (CPC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

RAJPUT SAMAJ(KARNATAKA) (A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT) REP BY ITS PRESIDENT MR MANOHAR SINGH RATHORE S/O LATE SHARDUL SINGH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.21, M BYRAPPA LANE RANSAINGHPET, COTTONPET CROSS, BENGALURU-560 053.

¶8

…APPELLANT

¶9

(BY SRI. DEVARAJ K S., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

SRI LALCHAND D JAIN S/O LATE DEVI CHAND JAIN AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO.J 103, TULIP BLOCK ETA GARDENS, MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560 023.

¶13

SRI RITESH KUMAR L JAIN S/O LALCHAND D JAIN AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO.J 103, TULIP BLOCK, ETA GARDENS, MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560 023.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

(BY SRI. AJIT KALYAN.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:14511 MFA No. 7369 of 2023

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED ON I.A. NO.1 IN O.S.NO. 4044/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE 24^TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (C.C.H.NO.6), REJECTING I.A. NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC.

¶19

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶21

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶22

Learned counsels for both parties have filed joint

¶23

memo, which reads as under:

¶24

" The Appellant and Respondent in the above appeal respectfully submit to this Hon'ble Court that, with the intervention of elders and well-wishers, the dispute between the parties has been resolved amicably. Both parties have agreed to withdraw all allegations made against each other and undertake not to pursue any further proceedings in respect of the subject matter of this appeal.

¶25

It is therefore jointly submitted that the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as withdrawn, in the interest of justice ."

¶26

¶27

NC: 2026:KHC:14511 MFA No. 7369 of 2023

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29