H G Madhava, v. H G Keshava
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru (K.S. Hemalekha J., 10.03.2026) — MFA No. 9048 of 2025 (CPC): appeal against dismissal of interim injunction application (I.A.No.10) under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC in O.S.No.2/2025 (Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mudigere); appeal dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's memo, with liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court mentioning the property schedule; contentions of both parties kept open; no merits decided; withdrawal of appeal; interim injunction; Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file a fresh application before the Trial Court under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC by mentioning the property schedule of the property in which the appellant claims peaceful possession and enjoyment; all contentions urged by both parties kept open for adjudication by the Trial Court.