G. Revanna v. Nagaraja
Case brief
What is this about?
MFA No.2870/2013 filed by G. Revanna against an MVC award awarding compensation under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
M.F.A.No.2870/2013(MV)
BETWEEN:
G. REVANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O. GOWDARA SANNA SIDDAPPA OWNER OF THE TRACTOR TRAILOR No.KA-16/T-3667-3668 R/O CHIKKAGONDANAHALLY, CHITRADURGA TQ AND DIST.- 577 501.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE N, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1 . NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, S/O THIPPESWAMY, R/O. CHIKKAGONDANAHALLY CHITRADURGA TQ & DIST.- 577 501.
2 . M/S. NATIONAL INSU. CO. LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER LAKSHMI BAZAR, CHITRADURGA – 577 501.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. REVANNA
- respondent
NAGARAJA
- respondent
M/S. NATIONAL INSU. CO. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/2870/2013
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court