schedule property to B.Suresh and B.Krishnamurthy, who are the sons of Bayyareddy, and the ‘C’ schedule property to his second brother, Krishna Reddy. The said Narayan Reddy died on 08.10.2000, and the khata was entered in the name of defendant No.1. Thereafter, defendant No.1 converted the land and executed a Joint Development Agreement in favour of M/s. Concorde Housing Corporation Private Limited. Thereafter, defendant No.1 executed three registered Gift deeds. The plaintiff, being the daughter, shall not affect or invalidate any disposition or alienation, including any partition, which had taken place before 20.12.2004. In the present case, a partition took place between Narayanareddy and his brothers on 24.01.1977, and Narayanareddy executed a registered will dated 03.04.2000. Hence, the present application is filed to reject the plaint. In response, the plaintiffs have filed an application opposing the same. It is stated that after the demise of the plaintiff’s father, T.S. Narayanareddy, there was no partition among the co-owners at any point of time. The transaction between defendant Nos.1 and 2 is not binding on the plaintiff, since the plaintiff is in joint possession of the suitscheduled property.
