Dismissed¶¶44

Sri. N. Nagaraj v. Smt. Sharadamma

Karnataka HC7 Jul 2026WP/3608/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 3608 of 2024 (GM-CPC); N. Nagaraj v. Shradamma and others; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; prayer to direct trial court to send wills and revenue documents to Commissioner for scientific investigation/comparison of signatures of testators/executants; withdrawal memo; amicable settlement between parties; petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending I.As. closed; Justice Lalitha Kanneganti; order dated 07-07-2026; no ruling on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri. N. Nagaraj Vs Smt. Sharadamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:34092 WP No. 3608 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. N. NAGARAJ S/O LATE NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED 72 YEARS R/AT ILTHORE VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562110

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. RAMA MOHAN M., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. SHRADAMMA W/O SHIVARAMAIAH AGED 81 YEARS R/AT NO.27,

¶15

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

CHIKKAJA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI

¶17

BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 562 110

¶18

SMT. LALITHAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAMURTHY AGED 79 YEARS R/AT BOMMAVARA VILLAGE UGANAVADI POST DEVENAHALLI TALUK - 562 110

¶19

SMT. YESHODAMMA W/O SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT ATTIBELE VILLAGE

¶20

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:34092 WP No. 3608 of 2024

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

HOSKOTE TALUK

¶23

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110

¶24

SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O PATTABIRAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT HUNCHURU VILLAGE JALA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 562 110

¶25

SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O MALLIKARJUNAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.9/4 BHAGIRITHI NILAYA

¶26

SRI NANJUNDA RAO S/O SHANKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

¶27

SMT. ANNAPURANA D/O SHANKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

¶28

BOTH ARE R/AT AYYAPPA TEMPLE STREET, YELHANKA BENGALURU – 560 064

¶29

SRI I.C.VIJAYA KUMAR S/O CHIKKANANJAPPA AGED 45 YEARS

¶30

SRI I.C.KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE CHENNAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶31

RESPONDENTS NO.8 & 9 ARE R/AT ILLATHARU VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:34092 WP No. 3608 of 2024

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

¶36

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.T.K.RAJAGOPALA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 TO R5 SRI.K.S.UDAY, ADVOCATE FOR R1

¶37

SRI.M.S.VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R8 & R9)

¶38

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TODIRECT THE TRIAL COURT TO SEND THE WILLS ALONG WITH REVENUE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONER, TO COMPARE THE SIGNATURES OF THE TESTATORS/EXECUTANTS TO THE COMMISSIONER, FOR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION, TO GIVE REPORT.

¶39

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶40

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶41

ORAL ORDER

¶42

Memo is filed seeking withdrawal of the petition as both

¶43

the parties have settled the matter amicably. Memo is taken on record.

¶44

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn .