Dismissed¶¶60

Suryodaya Educational Trust v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC14 Jul 2026CRP/617/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP 617/2026 Karnataka HC; S.115 CPC; O.S.No.171/2022 Prl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC Anekal; I.A.No.3 allowed; plaint rejected (Annexure-A); Registry maintainability objection; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file appropriate petition within two weeks; return of original documents; pending I.As. closed; Suryodaya Educational Trust v State of Karnataka & others; Lalitha Kanneganti J.; dated 14 July 2026.

What did the court decide?

CRP dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate petition in accordance with law within two weeks of receipt of the copy of the order; Registry directed to return all original documents to the petitioner retaining copies; pending I.As. in the petition stand closed. ¶¶60

Suryodaya Educational Trust Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:35941 CRP No. 617 of 2026

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶8

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 617 OF 2026 (IO)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SURYODAYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI T. KRISHNA, S/O LATE ERAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT THIRUPALYA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI R. HEMANTH RAJ, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5^TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 002.

¶16

THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.

¶17

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN BUILDING K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560 009.

¶18

THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:35941 CRP No. 617 of 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT.

¶22

SMT. NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS.

¶23

SRI RAVI S/O LATE T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶24

SMT. SUJATHA D/O LATE T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

¶25

SRI UDAYKUMAR S/O LATE T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

¶26

SMT. SAVITHA D/O LATE T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.

¶27

SRI KANTHARAJ S/O LATE T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.

¶28

RESPONDENT NO.5 IS THE WIFE AND RESPONDENT NOS.6 TO 10 ARE THE CHILDREN OF LATE T. MUNIYAPPA) ALL R/AT NO.2, KOLANDAPPA GARDEN AANEPALYA, ADUGODI POST BANGALORE-560 030.

¶29

SMT. NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.

¶30

SMT. GEETHA D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.

¶31

SRI RAMESH S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA

¶32

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:35941 CRP No. 617 of 2026

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶35

(RESPONDENT NO.11 IS THE WIFE, AND RESPONDENT NOS.12 & 13 ARE THE CHILDREN, OF LATE KRISHNAPPA) ALL R/AT TULAKANAMMA GARDEN VANNARPET, VIVEKNAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 047.

¶36

SMT. JAYALAKSHMI W/O LATE VENUGOPAL MAJOR IN AGE.

¶37

SMT. KRISHNAMMA D/O MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.

¶38

SRI M. PAPARAJU S/O LATE MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.

¶39

SMT. KAMALA D/O MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.

¶40

SMT. HEMAVATHI D/O MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶41

RESPONDENT NO.14 IS THE DAUGHTER-IN-LAW, AND RESPONDENT NOS.15 TO 18 ARE THE CHILDREN, OF LATE MUNIYELLAPPA) ALL R/AT NO.13/10, YARRAPA GARDEN AUSTIN TOWN, VIVEKNAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 047.

¶42

SRI JAYARAM S/O. MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.

¶43

SRI KRISHNAIAH S/O. MUNIYAMMA

¶44

¶45

NC: 2026:KHC:35941 CRP No. 617 of 2026

¶46

HC-KAR

¶47

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS BOTH R/AT NO.11/8 S.R.GARDEN, VANNARPET VIVEKNAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 047.

¶48

…RESPONDENTS

¶49

THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.08.2025, PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, ON I.A.NO.3 IN O.S.NO. 171/2022, WHEREBY I.A.NO.3 WAS ALLOWED AND THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.171/2022 WAS REJECTED VIDE ANNEXURE-A.

¶50

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶51

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶52

ORAL ORDER

¶53

The Registry has raised objections regarding the maintainability of the petition, as the petitioner has come before the court against an order dated 20.08.2025 passed in OS.No.171/2022 by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Anekal, allowing the rejection of the plaint.

¶54

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶55

petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file an appeal.

¶56

NC: 2026:KHC:35941 CRP No. 617 of 2026

¶57

¶58

HC-KAR

¶59

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as

¶60

withdrawn with a liberty to file an appropriate petition in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

¶61

The Registry is directed to return all the original documents to the petitioner by keeping the copy of the same.

¶62

Pending I.As., in this petition shall stand closed.

¶63

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶64

TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43

Suryodaya Educational Trust v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suryodaya Educational Trust v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B N Thippeswamy Vs B N Gurumurthy

Sri. Y.C. Eshwar Reddy Vs Smt. Renukamma

Sri. Ravi. N. Shankar Vs Smt. S. Anitha

Smt. Kavitha Muppiri Vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited

Sri. Pramod S v Vs Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Limited (Bescom)

Sri R v Amaresh Vs Sri T v Mahadev