Dismissed¶37

M/S H S Traders v. Sri N Gopalakrishna

Karnataka HC11 Jun 2026CRL.RP/208/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), CRL.RP No. 208 of 2025, decided 11.06.2026 by H.P. Sandesh J. - revision under S.397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. / S.438 r/w 442 BNSS against acquittal under S.138 NI Act (C.C.No.881/2018; CRL.A.No.38/2024) dismissed for non-compliance with conditional order dated 12.02.2025 requiring deposit of 50% of cheque amount; petition not yet admitted; records remitted to Trial Court and First Appellate Court.

What did the court decide?

The matter being of the year 2025 and not yet admitted, and the conditional order dated 12.02.2025 (deposit of 50% of the cheque amount) not having been complied with, the question of considering the revision petition does not arise. ¶34

M/S H S Traders Vs Sri N Gopalakrishna — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28144 CRL.RP No. 208 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶8

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.208 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

M/S. H.S. TRADERS,

¶11

BANK COLONY, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, SHAINSHANAGARA, KOLAR-563101, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI.S.B. MUBARAK, S/O LATE MASTHAN SAB B.K., AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.

¶12

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

WRONGLY MENTIONED AS ROYAL RESIDENCE, RASHEED NAGAR, PATEL ROAD, OPP. KONDARAJANAHALLI DARGA, KOLAR-563 101, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. B.M.MUBARAK, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, EX-MUNICIPAL PRESIDENT, KOLAR TOWN-563 101.

¶14

ALSO AT M/S. M.S. POULTRY BREEDERS, TAVAREKERE, THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANGARA DISTRICT-562120.

¶15

…PETITIONER

¶16

(BY SRI. SURESH BABU B.N., ADVOCATE – ABSENT)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:28144 CRL.RP No. 208 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

AND:

¶21

SRI. N. GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT 7^TH CROSS, KARNAJIKATTE, KADRIPURA ROAD, KOLAR-563101.

¶22

…RESPONDENT

¶23

(BY SRI. M.S.HARINATH, ADVOCATE)

¶24

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.38/2024 BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR, DATED 07.12.2024 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.881/2018 DATED 04.03.2024 BY THE FIRST ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KOLAR, BY ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT.

¶25

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner is absent.

¶29

This Court vide order dated 12.02.2025 suspended

¶30

the sentence, subject to depositing 50% of the cheque amount deducting the amount already paid before the Trial Court within four weeks and the same has not been complied with. This

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:28144 CRL.RP No. 208 of 2025

¶32

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

matter is of the year 2025 and not yet admitted. Hence, the question of considering the revision petition does not arise, in

¶35

view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this

¶36

Court.

¶37