Dismissed¶30

Sri Abdul Rahiman v. Sri Valerian Rodrigues

Karnataka HC4 Mar 2026CRL.RP/163/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

criminal revision petition dismissed as abated; death of revision petitioner during pendency; memo dated 04.03.2026; S.397 r/w S.401 Cr.P.C.; CRL.RP No. 163 of 2021; CRL.A.No.148/2017 Mangaluru; C.C.No.29/2016 Belthangady; Dakshina Kannada; withdrawal of amount in deposit by respondent/complainant; High Court of Karnataka; V Srishananda J.

What did the court decide?

The amount in deposit was permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent/complainant on due identification. ¶30

Sri Abdul Rahiman Vs Sri Valerian Rodrigues — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:13360 CRL.RP No. 163 of 2021

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 163 OF 2021

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI ABDUL RAHIMAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O HAMZA BEARY, R/AT SANJAYA NAGARA, BELTHANGADY KASABA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 572 101.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. K PRASANNA SHETTY., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SRI VALERIAN RODRIGUES S/O SANTAN RODRIGUES, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, Digitally signed R/AT STYLO MEN'S WEAR, by PINTO COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD, SHARADAVANI B BELTHANGADY, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 572 101. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI RAJARAM.S., ADVOCATE)

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.10.2020 PASSED BY THE HONBLE II

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:13360 CRL.RP No. 163 of 2021

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANGALURU, D.K. IN CRL.A.NO.148/2017 AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 10.10.2017 IN C.C.NO.29/2016 PASSED BY THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BELTHANGADY, ETC.,

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Memo dated 04.03.2026 is filed by the learned

¶23

counsel for the revision petitioner reporting the death of revision petitioner. Memo reads as under:

¶24

"It is submitted that upon instructions by the counter part, the appellant died during the pendency of the above Criminal Revision Petition. In view of the same, Revision Petition may be dismissed as abated in the interest of justice".

¶25