Sri. Nagaraja K R v. M/S. Sriram Transport Company Ltd.

Karnataka HC4 Mar 2026CRL.RP/1292/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court criminal revision disposed on compromise memo; compensation payment condition with imprisonment on default as ordered by Trial Magistrate; Sections 397/401 CrPC revision; judgments challenged: C.C.No.26415/2011 (SCCH-20, 04.08.2014) and Crl.A.No.25137/2014 (CCH-58, 03.11.2017); petitioner Nagaraja K R (Gubbi, Tumkur) vs M/S. Sriram Transport Company Ltd.; judge V. Srishananda; decision 04.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition disposed of on the memo filed by petitioner's counsel with respondent's counsel endorsing no objection; condition recorded that if compensation is not paid as per the memo, the revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the Trial Magistrate. ¶¶24

Sri. Nagaraja K R Vs M/S. Sriram Transport Company Ltd. — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:13509 CRL.RP No. 1292 of 2017

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1292 OF 2017

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. NAGARAJA K R S/o RAMARAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT CHELUR VILLAGE, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572216

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. PANCHAM R D, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

M/S. SRIRAM TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD., A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT # 123, ANGAPPA NAICKEN STREET, CHENNAI HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS OFFICER SRI NAGABHUSHAN M C LEGAL EXECUTIVE NO.29/A, 2^ND FLOOR, K H ROAD BANGALORE - 560 008

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

(BY SRI D.NARAYANSWAMY, ADVOCATE)

¶16

THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.08.2014 PASSED BY THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV A.C.M.M., MAYOHALL UNIT, BANGALORE(SCCH-20) IN C.C.NO.26415/2011 AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.11.2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:13509 CRL.RP No. 1292 of 2017

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

LVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE(CCH-58) IN CRL.A.NO.25137/2014.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

After addressing the arguments for some time, a memo is filed by the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed no objection on the memo. Placing

¶24

the memo on record, petition stands disposed of .

¶25