Dismissed¶¶30

M/S Pathak Developers Pvt. Ltd., v. Sujatha S

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2026CRL.RP/1524/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pathak Developers Pvt. Ltd. (rep. by Srihari Pathak) v. Sujatha S.; CRL.RP No. 1524 of 2025; High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; H.P. Sandesh J.; decided 09.06.2026; dismissal of criminal revision petition for non-compliance with conditional interim order dated 12.01.2026; I.A.No.1/2026; S. 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.; underlying CC No.417/2019 (VI Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Mysuru) and CRL.A No.166/2024 (V Addl. District & Sessions Judge); no findings on the merits of conviction or sentence.

What did the court decide?

Since the conditional interim order dated 12.01.2026 was not complied with and the revision petition was not yet admitted, the question of entertaining the revision petition does not arise and no ground is made out to entertain the revision petition. ¶¶29

M/S Pathak Developers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Sujatha S — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27407 CRL.RP No. 1524 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶8

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1524 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

M/S. PATHAK DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS REG. OFFICE NO.2297/2 2ND FLOOR, RUKMA COMPLEX KALIDASA ROAD, MYSURU -02 R/BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRIHARI PATHAK.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. RAJATH, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SUJATHA S., W/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO.97/E, I FLOOR VISHWAKARMA COLONY GAYATHRIPURAM MYSURU-02

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE)

¶18

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 16.04.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE IN CRL.A NO.166/2024 AND THE ORDER OF SENTENCE AND CONVICTION DATED 22.02.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED VI ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MYSURU IN CC NO.417/2019.

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:27407 CRL.RP No. 1524 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.

¶26

This matter is listed for consideration of

¶27

I.A.No.1/2026, wherein prayer is sought for vacating the interim order dated 12.01.2026 on the ground that conditional order dated 12.01.2026 has not been complied within a period of four weeks.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that interim order dated 12.01.2026 has not been complied with.

¶29

When such being the case, when the interim order has not been complied with and the revision petition is not yet admitted, question of entertaining the revision petition does not arise and no ground is made out to entertain the revision petition.

¶30

Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.

¶31

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶32

¶33

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

M/S Pathak Developers Pvt. Ltd., v. Sujatha S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Pathak Developers Pvt. Ltd., v. Sujatha S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwini S Vs Uday R

Rathnamma Vs State of Karnataka

Sri P a Latheef Vs Sri K M Hasim

Mithun K N Vs Rajesh

B. C. Varadaraju Vs M. Renukappa

Sri Srinivasamurthy Vs Smt Sowbhagyamma