Disposed¶29

Jerald Jude D Silva v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Mar 2026CRL.P/725/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 725 of 2026; M. Nagaprasanna, J.; decision dated 03-03-2026; petition under S. 482 Cr.PC / S. 528 BNSS to quash PCR No. 290/2025 and FIR Crime No. 117/2025 of Karkala Town Police Station (Karkala Taluk, Udupi District) for offences under BNS Sections 314, 315, 316, 318 r/w 3(5); withdrawn by Memo as infructuous after police filed 'B' report (printed as '8B9 Report'); criminal petition disposed; no merits adjudication; no precedents cited; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the criminal petition accepted in terms of the Memo; petition disposed; no order passed on the merits of the quashing prayer. ¶29

Jerald Jude D Silva Vs State of Karnataka — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:13044 CRL.P No. 725 of 2026

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.725 OF 2026

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

JERALD JUDE D9SILVA S/O IMMANVEL D SILVA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NELLIGUDDE, KARKALA MIYAR, MIYAR, UDUPI 3 574 107

¶11

&PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICE KARKALA UDUPI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE 560 001

¶16

SRI RAJ KUMAR SHETTY S/O MANJAYYA SHETTY RESIDING AT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT MANJARAYI MIYARI VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT 574 107

¶17

&RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPPL FOR R1)

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:13044 CRL.P No. 725 of 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN PCR NO.290/2025 SUBSEQUENTLY THE FIR IN CRIME NO.117/2025 REGISTERED BY THE KARKALA TOWN POLICE STATION AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 314, 315, 316, 318 R/W SECTION 3(5) OF THE BNS ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KARKALA.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner files a Memo

¶26

seeking withdrawal of the criminal petition. The Memo so

¶27

filed reads as follows:

¶28

< It is submitted that, the respondent police filed 8B9 Report in the above matter, Hence the petition is infructuous and this Hon9ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present Petition, in the interest of justice.=

¶29

2. In terms of Memo, the criminal petition stands

¶30

disposed .

¶31

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶32

¶33

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 72

Jerald Jude D Silva v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jerald Jude D Silva v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Haris @ Haris Vs the State of Karnataka

Mounesh Vs the State of Karnataka

Aschem Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Auro Pharmaceuticals and Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Ms. Nayana. D Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Ranganatha. N. S. Vs the State of Karnataka

Shivananda Vs the State of Karnataka