Disposed¶48

Shivananda v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Mar 2026CRL.P/15221/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.P No. 15221 of 2025; High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; decided 03-03-2026; single judge M. Nagaprasanna. Quashing of criminal proceedings on amicable settlement between parties; joint affidavit seeking compounding of offences; petition under S.482 Cr.PC (also noted as S.528 BNNS); offences under Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 IPC; C.C.No.28051/2023 before XLVIII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru; Halasurgate Police Station; complainant/respondent No.2 Vinay Babu (Manager, Maruthi Manjunatha Logistics Pvt. Ltd.); petitioner/accused Shivananda; counsel M.R. Balakrishna, B.N. Jagadeesha (Addl. SPP), Balu P.; proceedings quashed qua petitioner; I.A.No.1/2025 disposed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition disposed; proceedings in C.C.No.28051/2023 quashed qua the petitioner; I.A.No.1/2025 disposed as a consequence.

Shivananda Vs the State of Karnataka — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:13057 CRL.P No. 15221 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15221 OF 2025

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SHIVANANDA

¶9

S/O LATE NANJUNDAIYA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO. 173, 12^th CROSS RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA LAGGERE, BENGALURU – 560 058.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI M.R.BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HALASURGATE POLICE STATION BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶15

VINAY BABU

¶16

S/O VIJAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶17

MANAGER, MARUTHI MANJUNATHA LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:13057 CRL.P No. 15221 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

NANJAPPA BUILDING, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 024.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SRI BALU P., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶24

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.28051/2023 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 420, 465, 468, 471 OF IPC NOW PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE XLVIII A.C.J.M BENGALURU WHICH IS INITIATED BY THE 1^ST RESPONDENT/HALASURUGATE P.S.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Petitioner – accused is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.28051/2023, pending before the XLVIII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Bengaluru, for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 of the IPC.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner – accused and respondent No.2 – complainant in unison submit that during the pendency of these proceedings, the parties to the lis have settled their disputes amicably by drawing up certain terms and

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:13057 CRL.P No. 15221 of 2025

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

conditions. The parties have filed a joint affidavit before this Court seeking permission to compound the offences.

¶34

The joint affidavit reads as follows:

¶35

“…. …..

¶36

2. We state that with the intervention of wellwishers, relatives and friends we have settled the dispute amicably and we don't want to proceed with the criminal proceedings in CC.No.28051/2023 which is pending on the file of Hon'ble XLVIII Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore.

¶37

3. We state that since we have settled the dispute amicably out of the court, the above criminal petition kindly be allowed and entire criminal proceedings in CC.No.28051/2023 pending on the file of Hon'ble XLVIII Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore may be quashed.

¶38

4. We state that we have sworn to this affidavit voluntarily and not influenced by coercion, threat or undue influence.

¶39

5. We state that if this Hon'ble court is not pleased to pass an order allowing the above criminal petition and quash the entire criminal proceedings in CC.No.28501/2023 pending on the file of Hon'ble XLVIII Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore we will suffer irreparable loss and great hardship.”

¶40

In the light of the afore-quoted joint affidavit and since

¶41

the allegations are not against the State, I deem it appropriate to accept the joint affidavit filed by the parties and terminate the proceedings against the petitioner.

¶42

¶43

NC: 2026:KHC:13057 CRL.P No. 15221 of 2025

¶44

HC-KAR

¶45

For the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following:

¶46

ORDER

¶47

(i) The criminal petition is disposed.

¶48

(ii) The proceedings in C.C.No.28051/2023, pending before the XLVIII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Bengaluru, stand quashed, qua the petitioner.

¶49

I.A.No.1/2025 is also disposed, as a consequence.

¶50

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶51

NVJ

¶52

List No.: 3 Sl No.: 7 CT:SS

Shivananda v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivananda v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Haris @ Haris Vs the State of Karnataka

Mounesh Vs the State of Karnataka

Aschem Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Auro Pharmaceuticals and Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Ms. Nayana. D Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Ranganatha. N. S. Vs the State of Karnataka

Puneeth S Vs State of Karnataka