Disposed¶26

Mr. Syed Asad Ahamed v. Mr. Kunhi Moosa

Karnataka HC4 Jun 2026CRL.P/5260/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 5260 of 2026; NC: 2026:KHC:26781; M. Nagaprasanna, J.; decided 04-06-2026; Section 482 Cr.P.C.; Section 528 BNNS (as printed); challenge to interim order dated 27.02.2026 in Crl.A.No.25095/2026 (73rd Addl. Civil and Session Judge, Mayo Hall) suspending sentence dated 07.11.2025 in C.C.No.57284/2023 (XXXIII A.C.J.M., Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru); joint memo of settlement treated as plea of guilt; 10 percent fine deposit and personal bond condition; appeal dismissed on merits 13/05/2026; petition withdrawn as infructuous; Syed Asad Ahamed v. Kunhi Moosa (M/s. Savoury International Hotel).

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn and disposed as withdrawn (having become infructuous). ¶26

Mr. Syed Asad Ahamed Vs Mr. Kunhi Moosa — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26781 CRL.P No. 5260 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5260 OF 2026

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. SYED ASAD AHAMED, S/O. SYED AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT. NO.1102, PRESTIGE CLARKE WOOD APARTMENT, NO.11, CLARKE ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. MOHAMMAD NIYAZ S., ADVOCATE) AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

MR. KUNHI MOOSA, THE PARTNER, M/S. SAVOURY INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, NO.50/7, 3^RD FLOOR, 39^TH CROSS, 16^TH MAIN, 4^TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 041.

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE CRL.P, QUASH THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 27.02.2026 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.25095/2026 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL, SUSPENDING THE SENTENCE DATED 07.11.2025 PASSED ON A JOINT MEMO OF SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT TREATING IT AS A PLEA OF GUILT IN C.C.NO.57284/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIII A.C.J.M MAYO HALL UNIT BENGALURU SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION OF DEPOSIT OF 10 PERCENT OF THE SENTENCE OF FINE AMOUNT IMPOSED AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A PERSONAL BOND FOR THE BALANCE FINE

¶15

¶16

NC: 2026:KHC:26781 CRL.P No. 5260 of 2026

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

AMOUNT WITH A LIKE SUM SURETY BEFORE THE TRAIL COURT PRODUCED AT ANNEUXRE-A.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

¶23

" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶24

The Petitioner named above most respectfully submits as follows:

¶25

The Petitioner had challenged the Interim order passed in Criminal Appeal No.25095 dated 27.02.2026, on the file of 73^rd Additional Civil and Session Judge, Mayo Hall. The said Criminal Appeal has been dismissed on merits by its order dated 13/05/2026. Hence, the present Criminal Petition has become infructuous and the same may kindly be disposed of as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶26

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶27

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶28

¶29

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14

Mr. Syed Asad Ahamed v. Mr. Kunhi Moosa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Syed Asad Ahamed v. Mr. Kunhi Moosa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Sendhil G Vs State of Karnataka

Syed Azim Vs State of Karnataka

Dr.Revanasiddeshwara M.Kuntimath Vs the State by

Shri. J.M.Praveen Raj Vs State of Karnataka

Mr S Harish Vs State by Kamakshipalya Police Station

Siddaiah B Vs State of Karnataka