Disposed¶38

R L Parameshwaraiah v. State by Cbi/Acb

Karnataka HC16 Apr 2026CRL.P/2730/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court criminal petition (s.482 Cr.PC / s.528 BNNS) for quashing CBI/ACB FIR R.C.No.02(A)/2026 under PC Act 1988 ss.13(2)/13(1)(b) and 13(2)/13(1)(e); abatement of proceedings on death of sole accused; release of seized material to deceased accused's family; petitioner former HUDCO Joint General Manager (Proj.); bench: Justice M. Nagaprasanna; decided 16 April 2026.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings abated on the death of the sole accused; respondent-CBI directed to release the seized material to the hands of the family of the petitioner. ¶38

R L Parameshwaraiah Vs State by Cbi/Acb — Corruption | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:20809 CRL.P No. 2730 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2730 OF 2026

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

R.L.PARAMESHWARAIAH, THE THEN JOINT GENERAL MANAGER (PROJ), HUDCO, S/O LAKSHMAIAH B, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O NO.11, 16^TH B MAIN ROAD, 4^TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 034.

¶9

&PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI.C.H.JADHAV, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJASHEKARA T.B., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

STATE BY CBI/ACB, BANGALORE. REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶14

&RESPONDENT

¶15

(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶16

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRL.P AND QUASH THE FIR IN R.C.NO.02(A)/2026 /CBI /ACB/BLR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S

¶17

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:20809 CRL.P No. 2730 of 2026

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

13(2) R/W 13(1)(b) OF P.C ACT 1988 (AS AMENDED IN 2018) AND UNDER SEC.13(2) R/W 13(1)(e) OF P.C ACT 1988 REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT CBI NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXI ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND PRL.SPL.JUDGE FOR CBI CASES BENGALURU CITY.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following prayer:

¶24

"i) Call for the relevant records;

¶25

ii) Allow this Criminal Petition and quash the FIR in R.C.No.02(A)/2026/CBI/ACB/BLR for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(b) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) and under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of P.C. Act, 1988 registered by Respondent-CBI now pending on the file of XXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge & Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases (CCH 4), Bangalore City, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶26

iii) Pass any such other Order/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶27

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:20809 CRL.P No. 2730 of 2026

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

Heard Sri. C.H. Jadhav, learned Senior counsel

¶30

appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent and have perused the material on record.

¶31

Learned Senior counsel, Sri. C.H. Jadhav appearing for the petitioner submits that during the subsistence of the proceedings the accused is dead.

¶32

In the light of the sole accused dying during the proceedings, the proceedings stand abated against the said accused as the offence was the one punishable under Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

¶33

Learned Senior counsel submits that at the time of registration of the crime, several seizures had taken place of the material found at the time of search.

¶34

In the light of the proceedings standing abated, the natural corollary would be release of those items that were seized at the hands of the respondent - CBI to the family of the petitioner.

¶35

¶36

NC: 2026:KHC:20809 CRL.P No. 2730 of 2026

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

On the aforesaid reasons, the petition stands disposed with a direction to the respondent - CBI as a consequence of the proceedings getting abated to release the seized material to the hands of the family of the petitioner.

¶39

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶40

SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

R L Parameshwaraiah v. State by Cbi/Acb

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R L Parameshwaraiah v. State by Cbi/Acb

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Govindaraju Vs Smt Rajini

Dasthagir Sharif Aliyas Althaf Dastagir Sharif @ Althaf Vs the State of Karnataka

Axis Bank Ltd. Vs the State of Karnataka

Barnalee Hajra Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Sanjay M Rao Chavan Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Sandeep G Vs the State of Karnataka