Disposed¶40

Sri Kashif Saleem v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2026CRL.P/2113/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.P 2113/2026, High Court of Karnataka, M. Nagaprasanna, 21.07.2026; quashing petition under S. 482 CrPC (filed as S. 528 BNNS) against Crime No.20/2026 (BNS ss. 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 r/w 3(5); DP Act ss. 3 and 4) pending before XXIV Addl. CJM Bangalore; charge sheet filed during pendency rendering petition infructuous; memo for withdrawal dated 01.06.2026; petition disposed as withdrawn; no merits decision on quashability.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as withdrawn upon counsel's withdrawal memo dated 01.06.2026; no ruling on the merits of quashing Crime No.20/2026. ¶40

Sri Kashif Saleem Vs the State of Karnataka — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:37596 CRL.P No. 2113 of 2026

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

CNR: KAHC010098482026

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2113 OF 2026

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI. KASHIF SALEEM, S/O LATE FAYAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

¶12

SMT. SHAHEEN TAJ, W/O LATE FAYAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

¶13

SMT.UMME HANI, W/O SYED ASLAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶14

Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

SMT. UMME SUMAIYA, W/O NAYAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.55/1, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, 3^RD CROSS, ITTIGE ANJANAPPA LANE, OLD PENSION MOHALLA, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 018.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SMT. RAJESHWARI M., ADVOCATE)

AND:

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:37596 CRL.P No. 2113 of 2026

¶22

CNR: KAHC010098482026

¶23

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY WOMEN POLICE STATION, DEVARAJA SUB-DIVISION, MYSORE CITY. REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶24

SMT. AIMAN ZUHA, W/O SYED NAVED ANJUM, D/O SHAFEEQ AHMED, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT NO.1326, 2^ND STAGE, 6^TH CROSS, RAJIVNAGAR, MYSORE.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SMT.WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR R1)

¶27

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.20/2026 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 R/W 3(5) OF THE BNS ACT AND 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT BY THE WEST WOMENS POLICE STATION PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL.CJM, BANGALORE.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶30

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:37596 CRL.P No. 2113 of 2026

¶33

CNR: KAHC010098482026

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has

¶36

filed a memo dated 01.06.2026 seeking withdrawal of the

¶37

petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

¶38

" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶39

The petitioners herein has filed the above petition as against the FIR. Wherein the respondent police have filed the charge sheet and therefore, the above petition becomes infructuous and therefore, the petitioners in the above case prays that, this Hon'ble Court be pleas dot dismiss the above petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶40

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as

¶41

withdrawn.

¶42

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶43

BSV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24

Sri Kashif Saleem v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Kashif Saleem v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnayadav @ Kallappagari Krishnappa Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Lokesh M Vs Smt. Deepika B

Sendil Kumar a Vs the State of Karnataka

Mrs Sudha Praveen Hubli Vs Mr. Praveen R Hubli

Sri. Somanna Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. R Madhava Reddy Vs State by Ramamurthy Nagar