Allowed

Sri Ravi v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Jan 2026CRL.P/14996/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shivashankar A. Marannavar allowed the petition for anticipatory bail in a criminal petition involving multiple offences including cruelty to animals and cattle slaughter. The court imposed conditions for the accused to appear and cooperate.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail in the event of arrest, subject to executing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000/-, cooperating with IO, and not tampering with witnesses.

Sri Ravi Vs State of Karnataka — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:157 CRL.P No. 14996 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION No. 14996 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI RAVI S/O CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT KODIBELAGULA VILLAGE SHRAVANABELOGOLA HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA HASAN DISTRICT-562 101.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR N D, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY IJOOR POLICE

¶14

Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

REPRESENT BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU -560 001.

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)

¶18

THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 (FILED U/S.482 BNSS) Cr.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGED THE PETITIONER (ACCUSED) ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL AND DIRECTED TO RESPONDENT POLICE IN THE EVENT OF PETITIONER (IJOOR POLICE) BEING ARRESTED IN CONNECTION OF CASE IN CRIME No.71/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 192(A),177

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:157 CRL.P No. 14996 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, SECTION 11(1)(a) OF PREVENTION OF CRUETLY TO ANIMAL ACT SECTION 11(1)(a) OF PREVENTION OF ANIMAL ACT SEC.4,5 OF KARANTAKA PREVENTION OF SLAUGHTER AND PRESERVATION OF CATTLE ACT 2022 SEC.7,12 OF KARNATAKA PREVENTION OF SLAUGHTER AND PRESERVATION OF CATTLE ACT 2020 AND SEC.325 OF BNS 2023

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.71/2025 of Ijoor Police Station, registered for offences under Section 192(A), 177 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1989, Section 11(1)(a) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Sections 5, 4 of the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act, 2020, Section 97 of the Transportation Animals Act, 1978, Sections 7, 12 of the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act, 2020 and Section 325 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶27

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:157 CRL.P No. 14996 of 2025

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned

¶31

Additional SPP for respondent/State.

¶32

Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that

¶33

the petitioner has purchased cows in Hassan and he was transporting them to his place and he purchased the same for agriculture purpose and not for cow slaughtering. The offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. The petitioner even though was found on the spot in the vehicle has not been arrested. The petitioner is ready to co-operate with IO in investigation. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.

¶34

Per contra, learned Additional SPP would contend that the petitioner who was found transporting the cows, on enquiry has not produced any documents to show that he has purchased the cows. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

¶35

¶36

NC: 2026:KHC:157 CRL.P No. 14996 of 2025

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

Having heard the learned counsel, the Court has perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on record.

¶39

The petitioner is found transporting 7 Desi Cows in a vehicle KA-13 C 9189, without giving any proper food, water etc. It is the contention of the petitioner that he has purchased the cows in Hassan and he was taking them to his village for agriculture purpose. Even though the petitioner was present on the spot in the vehicle and even though he has been enquired by the complainant, the police have not arrested him. The petitioner has undertaken to co-operate with the police in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. The offences alleged against the petitioner are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life.

¶40

Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has

¶41

made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions. In the result, the following:

¶42

5 - NC: 2026:KHC:157 CRL.P No. 14996 of 2025

¶43

HC-KAR

¶44

ORDER

¶45

Petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest, in Crime No.71/2025 of Ijoor Police Station, subject to following conditions:

¶46

(i) Petitioner shall voluntarily appear before the IO within 15 days from this day and execute a bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

¶47

(ii) Petitioner shall co-operate with the IO in the investigation and appear before the IO whenever called for.

¶48

(iii) Petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

¶49

Sd/(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

¶50

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56 Ct.sm

Sri Ravi v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Ravi v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Rekha Gajakosh Vs Bank of Maharasthra

Saddam Husen Vs the State of Karnataka

Nazeel @ Aship Vs the State

Sri. Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Gowda Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Mansura Vs State of Karnataka by

Mr. Chethan Vs State of Karnataka