Dismissed¶¶28

Ravi Aliyas Bhayjan S/O Navalsingh Sengar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Jan 2026CRL.P/105011/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as withdrawn; withdrawal memo; regular bail under S. 439 CrPC not decided; Ss. 392/394/397 IPC; Navalgund Police Station, Gadag; S.C. No.40/2024, Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad; Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench; CRL.P No.105011 of 2025; decided 08-01-2026 by V. Srishananda, J.; no ratio on bail merits — cite only for practice/procedure of withdrawal, not for bail principles.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; leave to withdraw accepted and petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶28

Ravi Aliyas Bhayjan S/O Navalsingh Sengar Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC-D:153 CRL.P No. 105011 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 105011 OF 2025

¶7

(439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

RAVI @ BHAYJAN S/O NAVALSINGH SENGAR AGE 23 YEARS, OCC. CLEANER, R/O GHERA VILLAGE, TQ KUKSHI, DIST. DHAR, STATE MADHYA PRADESH.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. BASAVARAJ MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH THROUGH NAVALAGUND POLICE STATION DISTRICT GADAG 580011.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCTGP)

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C. 1973, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON REGULAR BAIL IN CR.NO.190/2023 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 392, 394, 397 OF IPC BY THE NAVALGUND POLICE PENDING IN S.C. NO.40/2024 ON THE FILE OF PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC-D:153 CRL.P No. 105011 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶24

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the

¶25

petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.

¶26

The memo reads as under:

¶27

"That, the above matter listed today for orders. The petitioner filed the petition for seeking enlargement on regular bail. In the changed circumstances, the petitioner is not desirous to pursue the matter. The petitioner seeking leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the petition. Hence, the memo.”

¶28

Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as

¶29

withdrawn .

¶30

Sd/(V.SRISHANANDA)

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

SMM / CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 12

Ravi Aliyas Bhayjan S/O Navalsingh Sengar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Aliyas Bhayjan S/O Navalsingh Sengar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashantagouda S/O Rachanagouda Neelappa Goudar Vs the State of Karnataka

Tajuddin Abdul Khadar Shet Vs the State of Karnataka

Vishwanath Khandelwal Vs the State of Karnataka

Praveen Kumar S/O Yallappa Rathod Vs the State of Karnataka

Chidanand S/O. Suresh Hullolli Alias Hallolli Vs State of Karnataka

Meti Ramalingappa Karibasappa Vs the State of Karnataka