Dismissed¶32

M/S Blackrain Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator, Liquidator of United Breweries (Holdings) Limited (in Liquidation)

Karnataka HC10 Apr 2026CA/393/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC company application dismissed for non-prosecution for want of representation; counsel's memo of retirement accepted. Keywords: Section 446(2)(a) Companies Act 1956; Rule 9 Companies (Court) Rules 1959; COP No. 57 of 2012; United Breweries (Holdings) Limited in liquidation; Official Liquidator; Blackrain Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.; Falcon Property Management Services; interim restraint; Schedule B property; disconnection of utility services; C.A. No. 59/2019.

What did the court decide?

The memo of retirement filed by Sri. Varun M.R., learned counsel for the applicant in C.A. No. 393 of 2024, was accepted and the counsel was permitted to retire. ¶31

M/S Blackrain Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs Official… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:20223 CA No. 393 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶8

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 393 OF 2024

¶9

¶10

COP NO. 57 OF 2012

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

M/S BLACKRAIN HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. NO.24, 16^TH FLOOR, CANBERRA BLOCK, UB CITY, VITTALMALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶13

REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. UMESH RAJU

¶14

…APPLICANT

¶15

(BY SRI. LUDHVEENA K. LUTHRIA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶16

AND:

¶17

Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI

¶18

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶19

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, LIQUIDATOR OF UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), CORPORATE BHAVAN, NO.26-27, 12^TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001

¶20

FALCON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRESTIGE FALCON TOWER NO.19, BRUNTON ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

¶23

NC: 2026:KHC:20223 CA No. 393 of 2024

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

(BY SRI. SHRISHAIL NAVALGUND, ADVOCATE FOR OL)

¶26

THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 446(2)(a) OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 READ WITH RULE 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959 PRAYING TO: A. RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM IN ANY MANNER INTERFERING WITH THE APPLICANT'S POSSESSION AND USAGE OF THE SCHEDULE B PROPERTY INCLUDING BY WAY RESTRAINING THEM FROM DISCONNECTING THE UTILITY SERVICES TO THE SCHEDULE B PROPERTY, TILL DISPOSAL OF C.A. NO. 59/2019; B. PASS AN AD-INTERIM ORDER IN TERMS OF PRAYER (A) ABOVE & ETC.

¶27

THIS APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

Sri.Varun M.R., learned counsel for the applicant in C.A.No.393 of 2024 has filed a memo of retirement.

¶31

The same is accepted. The counsel is permitted to retire in C.A.No.393 of 2024.

¶32

There is no representation on behalf of the applicant in C.A.No.393/2024, the same is dismissed for non prosecution.