Dismissed¶36

Smt. Sonnamma v. Sri. Ramakrishnareddy

Karnataka HC25 Oct 2025WP/9484/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ petition under Articles 226/227 Constitution of India; challenge to judgment dated 20.12.24 in M.A. No. 10/22 of 2nd Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kolar (Srinivasapur); prayer to set aside Annexure-D and interim stay refused by default; counsel Sri Narasimha Murthy G V. absent; office objections non-compliance; single judge Pradeep Singh Yerur; HC-KAR; NC: 2025:KHC:42416.

What did the court decide?

There being no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called out, and it appearing that the petitioners had no interest in prosecuting the petition, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶35

Smt. Sonnamma Vs Sri. Ramakrishnareddy — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:42416 WP No. 9484 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 9484 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. SONNAMMA W/O LATE PEDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

¶10

SRI VENKATAREDDY S/O LATE PEDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

¶11

SRI P RAVI W/O LT PEDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶12

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH

¶13

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 R/AT VARATANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT

¶15

SMT.RAMALAKSHMAMMA, W/O REDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NADAMPALLI VILLAGE, CHINATAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR PIN-562104.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SRI. NARASIMHA MURTHY G V.,ADVOCATE- ABSENT)

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:42416 WP No. 9484 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

AND:

¶22

SRI. RAMAKRISHNAREDDY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT VARATANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.

¶23

… RESPONDENT

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER THE ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DTD 20.12.24 PASSED BY THE 2ND ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KOLAR (ITINERATE AT SRINIVASAPUR) IN MA NO. 10/22 AT ANNX-DCALL FOR THE RECORDSGRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE ORDER DATED-20/12/2024 AT (ANNEXURE - D) AND FURTHER

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Order dated 15.09.2025 reads thus:

¶29

"Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non-prosecution."

¶30

In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuring days of the respective matters being given".