Dismissed¶45

Smt S H Shanthamma v. Sri Gurulingaiah

Karnataka HC25 Oct 2025WP/10056/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ petition (GM-CPC) under Articles 226 and 227 dismissed for non-prosecution on 25.10.2025 (Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur); petitioners absent when matter called out; earlier opportunity of 05.09.2025 to cure office objections lapsed; sought quashing of Ramanagara Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC order dated 02/08/2024 in Misc. No. 16/2013 and restoration of the miscellaneous case; counsel Nayeem Pasha S. recorded absent; no decision on merits; no costs or quantum; neutral citation NC: 2025:KHC:42414.

What did the court decide?

When the matter was called out, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. ¶43

Smt S H Shanthamma Vs Sri Gurulingaiah — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 10056 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT S H SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE SHIVARUDRA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶9

SRI. S.NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE SHIVARUDRA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,

¶10

SMT. RENUKAMMA W/O LATE VEERABHADRAIAH, D/O RAJASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,

¶11

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH

¶12

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SRI. K.R.SHIVASHANKARAIAH S/O RAJASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

¶14

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.312, ANCHEPALYA, KENGERI HOBLI, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU- 560074

¶15

…PETITIONERS

¶16

(BY SRI. NAYEEM PASHA S.,ADVOCATE- ABSENT)

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

AND:

¶20

SRI GURULINGAIAH S/O SIDDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/OF KODIYALA VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK.

¶21

SRI. K.S.PUTTAREVAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/OF YOGESHWARA EXTENSION, 5TH CROSS, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANGARA TALUK.

¶22

SRI. MUNIVENKATABHOVI DEAD BY HIS LRS.

¶23

3(A) SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O MUNIVENKATABHOVI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

¶24

3(B) SMT. GIRIJAMMA W/O SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶25

3(C) SRI. VENKATESHA S/O LATE MUNIVENKATABHOVI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶26

THE ABOVE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT MARLAMIDODDI VILLAGE, KODIYALA HARENAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOQUASH / SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02/08/2024 PASSED IN MISC. NO. 16/2013, BY THE HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT RAMANAGARA, VIDE ANNX-A AND RESTORE THE MISC. NO. 16/2013 BEFORE THE HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT RAMANAGARA TO PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CONTEST THE MATTER ON MERITS.

¶32

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Order dated 05.09.2025 reads thus:

¶36

"Ten days time is granted to comply with the

¶37

office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non-prosecution."