Dismissed¶¶28

Smt. Aruna. N v. Sri. T. M. Naveen Dead by Lrs

Karnataka HC5 Mar 2025WP/9205/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), single bench of B M Shyam Prasad J., 05.03.2025; WP No. 9205 of 2024 (HRC); writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 against rent-court decisions in H.R.C 6/2019 (01.04.2023) and R.E.V (Rent) 2/2023 (09.02.2024), Davanagere; dismissed as withdrawn on memo citing settlement of dispute and closure of execution petition Ex. No.119/2024 as fully satisfied; no merits adjudication; no precedent value on the rent-law challenge.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as withdrawn following settlement between the parties. ¶¶28

Smt. Aruna. N Vs Sri. T. M. Naveen Dead by Lrs — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:10019 WP No. 9205 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9205 OF 2024 (HRC)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

SMT. ARUNA. N D/O NAGARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO 232(707/1) OPP OLD BUS STAND (PRIVATE BUS STAND), P B ROAD, DAVANAGERE 577001 ADDITIONAL ADDRESS SMT ARUNA N, D/O NAGARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/O NO 671/52, 9^TH CROSS, BHAGATH SINGH NAGARA, DAVANAGERE 577002.

¶7

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶8

(BY SRI. G.J.SUNKAPUR.,ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

SRI. T. M. NAVEEN DEAD BY LRS,

¶12

01 SMT LATHA T R, W/O LATE T M NAVEEN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE

¶13

¶14

NC: 2025:KHC:10019 WP No. 9205 of 2024

¶15

SRI SHIVAPRASAD T M D/O LATE T M NAVEEN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, STUDENT

¶16

KUMARI NAYANA D/O LATE T.M. NAVEEN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS STUDENT RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3 ARE R/O SHANTINIVASA COMPOUND P.B. ROAD, OPP. OLD BUS STOP DAVANAGERE- 577001.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)

¶19

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN R.E.V(RENT) 2/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT DAVANAGERE AND ENTIRE RECORDS IN H.R.C 6/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT DAVANAGERE; DIRECTION AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE IN H.R.C 6/2019 DATED 01.04.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT DAVANAGERE (ANNX-E) AND IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN R.E.V (RENT) 2/2023 DATED 09.02.2024 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT DAVANAGERE (ANNX-G).

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10019 WP No. 9205 of 2024

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed

¶25

a memo for withdrawal which reads as under:

¶26

"It is respectfully submitted that the dispute between the parties is settled in Ex. No.119/2024 pending on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC at Davanagere on 22.08.2024 by the DHR/ Respondent herein filed memo stating that execution petition may be closed as fully satisfied. In view of the same present petition becomes infructuous. Hence, may be kindly be dismissed as withdrawn."

¶27

In the light of the afore, the petition stands

¶28

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶29

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶30

Smt. Aruna. N v. Sri. T. M. Naveen Dead by Lrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Aruna. N v. Sri. T. M. Naveen Dead by Lrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Divisional Controller Vs the Assistant Labour Commissioner

Smt. Rathnamma Vs United Spirits

Smt Lalitha T Vs the Chief Commissioner Bbmp

The Divisional Controller Vs Shri Nazarathullah Sherief

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs D. Yogaraju

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited Vs Ganapathi Gajanana Bhat