Sri. Riyaz Ahmed Khan v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:5726 | Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru | WP No. 8292 of 2017 (LB-RES) | Riyaz Ahmed Khan v. State of Karnataka and Channapatna City Municipal Council | Coram: N S Sanjay Gowda, J. | Decided 07-02-2025 | Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India | Challenge to notice dated 26.09.2016 issued by Channapatna City Municipal Council (Annexure-G) | Counsel submitted possession of schedule property taken in 2012 | Petition disposed of as infructuous; no merits adjudication; no precedents cited; no monetary reliefs.
What did the court decide?
In view of the submission that the respondents had taken possession of the schedule property from the petitioner in 2012 itself, the writ petition does not survive and is disposed of as having become infructuous. ¶24