Dismissed¶30

Sri R Kishore v. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike

Karnataka HC6 Feb 2025WP/10390/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 10390 of 2020 (LB-BMP); High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Justice N S Sanjay Gowda; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to approach Civil Court against BBMP; BBMP demolition of petitioner's structure; water tank erected on schedule property; ingress and egress; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike; Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board; decision dated 06-02-2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner, as sought for, to approach the Civil Court for issuance of appropriate action against BBMP. ¶30

Sri R Kishore Vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:5442 WP No. 10390 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 10390 OF 2020 (LB-BMP)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

SRI R KISHORE S/O. RAJKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT NO. 146, 9^TH MAIN, 60 FEET ROAD, J.C. NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM LAYOUT, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 086.

¶7

…PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SRI. AKASH V T., ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, HAVING ITS OFFICE ITS NARASIMHA RAJA SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002.

¶12

ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER CHANDRA LAYOUT SUB-DIVISION, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE COMPLEX, 14^TH CROSS, CHANDRA LAYOUT, 1^ST STAGE, BANGALORE-560 039.

¶13

BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, 2^ND FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

(BY SRI. AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:5442 WP No. 10390 of 2020

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECT THE RESPONDENTS FROM OBSTRUCTING / INTERFERING WITH FREE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF THE PETITIONER TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM ENCROACHING / DEMOLISHING EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE OF THE PETITIONER SITUATED IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition was filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to restrain them from interfering with the free ingress and egress of the petitioner to his property.

¶23

Further, he submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, BBMP has demolished the structure situated in the property of the petitioner and has erected a water tank over the said land.

¶24