Sri. Srikanta Upadhyay, v. Icici Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; NC: 2025:KHC:15092; WP No. 7752 of 2023 (GM-RES); decided 08.04.2025 by Hon'ble Mr Justice M. Nagaprasanna. Petitioners: Srikanta Upadhyay and Vandana Upadhyay (counsel: Manjunath K.V). Respondents: ICICI Bank Ltd. (counsel: Jai M. Patil) and M/s. Bengaluru Blues Entertainment India Private Limited (served and unrepresented). Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution sought quashing of the order in Crl Misc No.1140/2023 dated 20.03.2023 of the Vith Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, and the notice dated 29.03.2023 issued by the R-1 Bank; disposed as withdrawn on counsel's memo. Keywords: withdrawal, disposed as withdrawn, quashing, Crl Misc 1140/2023, Articles 226 227.
What did the court decide?
Petition permitted to be withdrawn and disposed as withdrawn in terms of the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners; no quashing of the magistrate's order or the bank's notice was effected.