Sri R Hanumanthappa v. the Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Ashok S.Kinagi, J.) WP 7043/2025 (S-RES), decided 09.12.2025: five KPTCL retirees seek mandamus under Articles 226/227 to consider representations (Annexures F-F4) for annual increment for last year of service, basic pay fixation and consequential retirement benefits; representations unanswered by Director (A and HR), KPTCL; direction issued in terms of order dated 21.02.2025 in W.P.No.10703 of 2024 and connected matters, confirmed by Writ Appeal Nos.634 and 636 of 2025 (dismissed 16.10.2025); appropriate order to be passed in accordance with law within eight weeks; writ petition allowed.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No.2 directed to consider the representations vide Annexures 'F' to 'F4' in terms of the order dated 21.02.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.10703 of 2024 and connected matters, and to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within eight weeks from receipt of a copy of the order.