Dismissed¶31

Govindaswamy v. N. Rajamma

Karnataka HC25 Nov 2025WP/6679/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HC-KAR, WP No. 6679 of 2023 (GM-CPC), Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, order dated 25/11/2025: Article 227 petition against an execution/FDP-stage interlocutory order (I.A.No.4/2022, Ss.47/151 and 54 CPC, F.D.P.No.25028/2020, XXVIII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengaluru) dismissed for non-prosecution for want of representation and non-deposit of costs; no ratio on merits; cite only for procedural disposal practice.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation for the petitioner when the matter was called twice, the petitioner appeared not interested in prosecuting the petition. ¶31

Govindaswamy Vs N. Rajamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:48782 WP No. 6679 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 6679 OF 2023 (GM-CPC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

GOVINDASWAMY S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 121, RAJKUMAR ROAD, WARD NO. 4, KOTE, NEW EXTENSION, KENGERI, BENGALURU - 560 060.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI SHASHIDHAR BELAGUMBA, ADV., -ABSENT)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

N. RAJAMMA D/O. SMT. JAYALAXMI @ MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.148, VASUDHA NILAYA SHANTIVILAS LAYOUT, BEHIND BETHASTA SCHOOL, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 060.

¶13

VENKATESH S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.

¶14

SMT. SHAILAJA D/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.

¶15

KRISHNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.

¶16

SMT. KALAVATHI S/O. NARAYANAPPA,

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:48782 WP No. 6679 of 2023

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.

¶21

RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO.121, RAJKUMAR ROAD WARD NO.4, KOTE NEW EXTENSION, KENGERI, BENGALURU - 560 060.

¶22

SMT. S. KAMALA W/O V. DESHI KASHARI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO.C101, ARVIND ARSHIRVAD, KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD, SAHAKARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 092.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMON ORDER DTD 24/02/2023 ON I.A.NO. 4/2022 FILED U/SEC 47 R/W 151 CPC ALTHOUGH TEH R-1 / DHR FILED AN I.A. U/SEC 54 OF C.P.C IN F.D.P.NO. 25028/2020 PASSED BY THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE AT MAYO HALL UNIT, (CCH-29) BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-E.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Matter is being listed for the fourth time for noncompliance of office objections. The cost imposed by this Court on 27.10.2023 is also not deposited by the petitioner till date.

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:48782 WP No. 6679 of 2023

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

The matter is called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Under the circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶32

Sd/(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

¶35

Govindaswamy v. N. Rajamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govindaswamy v. N. Rajamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H S Jayappa Vs K B Prakash

A Mohammed Rasool @ Mujeeb Pasha Vs Smt. Vageeswari S

Sri Jayarma Vs Smt. G S Uma

Smt. Munirathnamma Vs H T Muniraju

Sri C Ramakrishnaiah Vs Poojari Gowda

M/S Hajee Ebrahim Sait Wakf Vs M/S Indian Wood and Industries