Dismissed¶35

Smt. M Lakshmi Devi v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC7 Jan 2025WP/6076/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Writ Petition No. 6076 of 2021 (GM-Police); Petitioners Smt. M.Lakshmi Devi and five others vs State of Karnataka (Principal Secretary, Home Department) and City Police Commissioner, Bengaluru; decided 07-01-2025 by Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn at preliminary hearing on counsel's request, with recorded undertaking not to seek recall or file review; no issue decided, no precedent cited, no costs or amounts.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt. M Lakshmi Devi Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:382 WP No. 6076 of 2021

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 6076 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. M.LAKSHMI DEVI W/O SRI ANANTHU, D/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶10

SMT. MANJULA M., W/O LATE NAGARAJ, D/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶11

SRI LAKSHMI NARAYANA.M S/O LATE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SMT. M.GANGADEVI W/O NARASIMHAMURTHY, D/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

¶14

SUBHASH S/O LATE ANANTHU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

¶15

SMT. NETHRAVATHI @ NETHRA D/O LATE ANANTHU, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, SL. NO. 1 TO 6 ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.18/1, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, 3^RD CROSS,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:382 WP No. 6076 of 2021

¶18

A.K.COLONY, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040.

¶19

…PETITIONERS

¶20

(BY SRI K.P.JAYASIMHA., ADVOCATE)

¶21

AND:

¶22

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶23

THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE BENGALURU CITY POLICE, COMMISSIONER, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA)

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

Sri.Jayasimha.K.P., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person.

¶30

Counsel Sri.Jayasimha.K.P., submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

¶32

NC: 2025:KHC:382 WP No. 6076 of 2021

¶33

When queried, counsel Sri.Jayasimha.K.P., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition.

¶34

The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners about withdrawal of the Writ Petition is placed on record.

¶35

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶36

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶37

TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 29

Smt. M Lakshmi Devi v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt. M Lakshmi Devi v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Estate Officer and Chief Officer Vs Rafiq

Smt. Mamatha G C Vs the Principal Secretary

The Estate Officer and Chief Officer Vs P K Chandrappa

Sri Chetan B R Vs Smt Vasantha Gopalaiah

Sri M Gururaj Vs the State of Karnataka

Muniraju a Vs the Authorised Officer/Senior Manager