Petitioners sought a declaration that a cancellation order by the State was illegal. Before orders could be passed, counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 52970 OF 2019 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. OMKAR KAMBI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…PETITIONERS
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;
SRI.T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE "CANCELLATION ORDER" OF THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 07.05.2008 (AS REFERRED IN THE COMMUNICATION DATED 25.07.2011 BEARING NO.MUDA/VAHA/-6/2011-12 VIDE ANNEXUREK AS BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
Sri. Bhagya Jyothi Vidya Samsthe (Regd)
Leads Kendriya Vidyalaya
State of Karnataka, Dept. of Urban Development
Mysore Urban Development Authority
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
