Shri. S.P Nandishkumar v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; R. Nataraj, J.; WP No. 3823 of 2024 (LB-BMP); decided 2nd December, 2025; NC: 2025:KHC:50208. Oral order dismissing writ petition for non-prosecution — petitioner's counsel (Nikhil D Kamath) absent; earlier order dated 08.02.2024 not complied; petitioners deemed not interested in pursuing. Subject matter: direction to BBMP officials (Commissioner, Executive Engineer Bangalore South Division, Assistant Executive Engineer Uttarahalli Sub-Division) to remove alleged illegal construction by respondent No. 4 (S. Ajay Kumar) on Site No. 177/37 off Sy.No.24, Konanakunte Village. Filed under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India. No precedent discussed, no merits decided, no costs or amounts.
What did the court decide?
As the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and the order dated 08.02.2024 was not complied with, it appeared that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the writ petition.