Smt Rudramma v. T v Manjunath
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 52665 of 2019 (GM-CPC); dismissal for non-prosecution; petitioner absent / no representation; PF not furnished; notice to respondent No.4; Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; impugned order on I.A.No.2 in FDP No.20/2018 dated 17.10.2019; Principal Senior Civil Judge, Davanagere; Annexure-H; interim orders dated 27.06.2025 and 09.07.2025; relisted 15.07.2025; petitioner Smt. Rudramma; respondents incl. T.V. Manjunath, Kavitha, Veeresh, Vinutha, Smt. Gowramma (counsel R. Rangaswamy), Premakumari; petitioner's counsel M.S. Swathi for H.B. Rudresh; Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil; decided 15.07.2025; NC: 2025:KHC:26069.
What did the court decide?
As the petitioner appeared not interested in prosecuting the writ petition despite repeated indulgences (time granted on 27.06.2025 and till 14.07.2025 to furnish PF, etc., for notice to respondent No.4), the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.