Dismissed¶¶29

Jagadeesh R v. the Managing Director

Karnataka HC21 Mar 2025WP/444/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension order revoked during pendency; writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Petitioners: Jagadeesh R and Jagadeesh K.V., Junior Power Line Men, BESCOM, Tumakuru. Impugned order dated 19.12.2024 by Executive Engineer, BESCOM (Order No. KANIEM(V)/LEAA/SALEAA/HISA(C)/202425/19357-62, Annexure-U). Filed under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India. Bench: Justice R. Nataraj; decided 21 March 2025; WP No. 444 of 2025 (S-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:11857.

What did the court decide?

Since the respondents have revoked the order of suspension challenged in the writ petition, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. ¶¶27

Jagadeesh R Vs the Managing Director — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11857 WP No. 444 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 444 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

JAGADEESH R S/O. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS OCC - JUNIOR POWER LINE MEN WEST SECTION VINAYAK NAGAR TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101

¶8

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶9

JAGADEESH K.V. S/O. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS OCC - JUNIOR POWER LINE MEN WEST SECTION VINAYAK NAGAR TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101

¶10

(BY SRI. NATARAJ G., ADVOCATE)

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KPTCL, K.R. CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560 001

¶14

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, O & M SECTION HORAPETE

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11857 WP No. 444 of 2025

¶16

TUMAKURU DIVISION - 1 TUMAKURU - 572 101

¶17

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, HORAPETE TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101

¶18

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, VINAYAK NAGAR TUMAKURU CITY DIVISION-1 TUMAKURU - 572 101

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. A. CHANDRACHUD, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.12.2024 BEING PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ORDER NO. KANIEM(V)/LEAA/SALEAA/HISA(C)/202425/19357-62 VIDE ANNX-U IN SO FAR AS THE P-1 AND 2 ARE CONCERNED.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶24

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11857 WP No. 444 of 2025

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶27

petitioner has challenged an order of suspending him from service and the respondents have revoked the order of suspension. Therefore, the writ petition does not survive for consideration.

¶28

In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is

¶29

dismissed as having become infructuous .

¶30

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶31

¶32

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33

Jagadeesh R v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagadeesh R v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.S. Gowda Vs the State of Karnataka

H. N. Meena Vs the Registrar and Administrative Officer

Sri Shaheer Patel Vs the Karnataka Public Service Commission

Sri S R Thulasiram Vs the Registrar General

Smt Nandini N Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. K. J. Dharmappa Vs State of Karnataka