R.S. Gowda v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of writ petition as infructuous; consent-type dismissal on memo of Respondent No.4 (KIADB) and petitioner counsel's submission; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; challenge to notification No CI 106 IAP 2023 (PART) dated 03/07/2023 issued by State of Karnataka, Department of Commerce and Industries, qua Sl No 3 (Annexure-G); petitioner Assistant Engineer EE-2 KIADB; respondents include PWD Principal Secretary, Chief Engineer C and B South, and Maruthi K.N. Assistant Engineer (PWD); no merits adjudicated; no cases cited; Neutral Citation NC: 2025:KHC:11623; coram R. Nataraj, J.; decided 20/03/2025.
What did the court decide?
In view of the submissions of learned counsel (memo by counsel for Respondent No.4 and the petitioner's counsel's concurrence), the writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous; the order records no adjudication on the merits of the challenge to the notification.