Dismissed¶36

Sri Lokesh v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC7 Nov 2025WP/43726/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-prosecution dismissal; Karnataka HC writ petition (KLR-RES) WP No. 43726 of 2019, Justice Rajesh Rai K, order dated 07.11.2025; Articles 226-227 Constitution; prayer to quash notification Bengaluru dated 20.06.2019 (Annexure-A) issued by Respondent 1 (Revenue Department, State of Karnataka) and to declare 1 acre 3 guntas in Sy.No.98 of K Hemmanahalli Village, Yelwala Hobli, Mysore free from encumbrance; petitioners absent, no compliance with 30.10.2025 order to amend cause title; Rame Gowda LRs; no merits decided; no cases cited; no monetary relief.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶36

Sri Lokesh Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:45310 WP No. 43726 of 2019

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 43726 OF 2019 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI LOKESH, SON OF KENCHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDENT OF K.SALUNDI VILALGE, KERGALLI POST, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE 570026.

¶9

SRI RAME GOWDA DEAD BY HIS LR'S

¶10

Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

SMT PADMA, W/O LATE SRI RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.15, VISWAKARMA COLONY, ACHARI COLONY, BEHIND GOVERDHAN PETROL BUNK, 1^ST STAGE, GAYATHRIPURAM, MYSORE - 570019.

¶12

SRI PRAKASH C R, S/O LATE SRI RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶13

SRI JAGANNATHA C R, S/O LATE SRI RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶14

SMT SHASHIKALA, D/O LATE SRI RAMEGOWDA, W/O NAGESH GOWDA B H, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.1265, 5^TH CROSS,

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:45310 WP No. 43726 of 2019

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

BHARATH NAGARA 2^ND STAGE, BEL LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560091.

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI RUPESH KUMAR S, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶20

AND:

¶21

STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRTARIAT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001.

¶22

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR-562105.

¶23

THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT 570001.

¶24

M/S SEVEN HILLS SOUHARDA SAHAKARA CO-OPERTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.385, JANANAI BHAVAN, MARUTHI EXTENSION, MALUR, KOLAR DISTRICT 563130. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI.G.NARAYANPPA.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NELLAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1-R3, R4 - SERVED UNREPRSENTED)

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION BENGALURU DATED 20.06.2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND DECLARE THAT THE LAND IN QUESTION I.E., 1 ACRES 3 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY.NO.98 OF K HEMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, YELWALA HOBLI,

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:45310 WP No. 43726 of 2019

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT IS FREE FORM ANY ENCUMBRANCE AND ETC.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

There is no representation for the petitioners even on the

¶34

second call.

¶35

Though this Court directed the learned counsel for the petitioners to amend the cause title vide order dated 30.10.2025, neither the counsel is present nor there is compliance of the said order. Though the matter is of the year 2019, it seems that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the Writ Petition.

¶36

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution .

¶37

SD/(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

¶38

HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12

Sri Lokesh v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Lokesh v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B Marigowda Vs the Chairman

Sri K Ambarish Vs Sri Krishnappa

Ramachandra @ Horigowda Vs the State of Karnataka

Krishnappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Chinnapapamma Vs State of Karnataka

Sri U D Chandrashekar Vs the Deputy Commissioner