Smt Pankaja B v. Smt v K Rama
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed writ petition seeking to set aside order not extending absolute status quo. Held interim orders stand absolute until vacated. Status quo order restored.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed. Order of status quo dated 15.11.2025 continued until modified.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:51429 WP No. 36907 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 36907 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PANKAJA B., W/O SRI. D RAMASUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A NO.17, GANGA NIVAS, 3RD CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, SRI. MUNESHWARA LAYOUT, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 097.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VEERESH M. UPPIN.,ADVOCATE)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court is justified in setting aside the impugned order which did not extend an absolute status quo order.
Whether the Trial Court acted arbitrarily by not extending an interim order when no objection was raised by the defendants.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Pankaja B.
- respondent
2.
- respondent
7.
- respondent
10.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/36907/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court