Smt. Aamina Imtiyaz v. Mrs. Brinda D Manisundaram

Karnataka HC21 Aug 2025WP/36262/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petitions by memo 'not pressed'; Article 227 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; GM-CPC; impugned interlocutory order at Annexure-A dated 23/11/2024; I.A.No.5 in O.S.4429/2019; IA No.4 in OS 4428/2019; XXX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge Bangalore (CCH No. 31); representation through power of attorney holder; Justice M. Nagaprasanna; NC: 2025:KHC:32742.

What did the court decide?

Both writ petitions disposed as withdrawn (not pressed) pursuant to memos filed by the petitioner; no relief granted on the impugned orders. ¶51-52

Smt. Aamina Imtiyaz Vs Mrs. Brinda D Manisundaram — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:32742 WP No. 36262 of 2024 C/W WP No. 36374 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 36262 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

¶8

C/W

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 36374 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

¶10

IN WP No. 36262/2024

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

SMT. AAMINA IMTIYAZ W/O MR. IMTIYAZ AHMED SHAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT. NO. 12/2, 1^ST MAIN ROAD JAYAMAHAL EXTENTION BENGALURU – 560 046.

¶13

…PETITIONER

¶14

(BY SRI MOHAMMED NASIRUDDIN, ADVOCATE)

¶15

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

AND:

¶17

MRS. BRINDA D.MANISUNDARAM W/O MR. DEV MANISUNDARAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO. 106, BRIDGEVIEW CIR., RIDGELAND, MS 39157, U.S.A.,

¶18

REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. A.V.HARENDRA S/O MR. A.VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC:32742 WP No. 36262 of 2024 C/W WP No. 36374 of 2024

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

R/AT NO. 860. POONAMALLEE HIGH ROAD KILPAUK, CHENNAI - 600 010.

¶23

…RESPONDENT

¶24

(BY SRI P.B.APPAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

¶25

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.4429/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXX ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE (C.C.H.NO.31) AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A (IMPUGNED) IN REGARDS TO I.A.NO.5 DATED 23/11/2024 ON THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF C.P.C.

¶26

IN WP NO. 36374/2024

¶27

BETWEEN:

¶28

SMT. AAMINA IMTIYAZ W/O MR. IMTIYAZ AHMED SHAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO. 12/2, 1^ST MAIN ROAD JAYAMAHAL EXTENTION BENGALURU – 560 046.

¶29

...PETITIONER

¶30

(BY SRI MOHAMMED NASIRUDDIN, ADVOCATE)

¶31

AND:

¶32

MRS. BRINDA D.MANISUNDARAM W/O MR. DEV MANISUNDARAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO. 106, BRIDGEVIEW CIR., RIDGELAND, MS 39157, U.S.A.,

¶33

REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER

¶34

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:32742 WP No. 36262 of 2024 C/W WP No. 36374 of 2024

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

MR. A.V. HARENDRA S/O MR. A.VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO. 860. POONAMALLEE HIGH ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI - 600 010.

¶37

...RESPONDENT

¶38

(BY SRI P.B.APPIAH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

¶39

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN OS 4428/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE (CCH NO. 31) AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A (IMPUGNED) IN REGARDS TO IA NO. 4 DATED 23/11/2024 ON THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF C.P.C.

¶40

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶41

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶42

ORAL ORDER

¶43

Learned counsel for the petitioner in both the petitions,

¶44

files memos seeking permission to withdraw the petitions.

¶45

The one of the memos filed in W.P.No.36262/2024,

¶46

reads as follows:

¶47

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:32742 WP No. 36262 of 2024 C/W WP No. 36374 of 2024

¶48

HC-KAR

¶49

“MEMO FOR DISMISSAL

¶50

The Petitioner herein respectfully submits that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above Writ Petition as not pressed. It would be in the interest of justice to do so.”

¶51

In terms of the memos, the writ petitions are disposed as

¶52

withdrawn.

¶53

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶54

NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18 CT:SS

Smt. Aamina Imtiyaz v. Mrs. Brinda D Manisundaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Aamina Imtiyaz v. Mrs. Brinda D Manisundaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri S Cheluvegowda Vs the Chief Secretary

Dr K N Satish Vs Bajaj Finance Ltd.

Rajeshwari. S. J. Vs M. N. Sampath Iyengar

M/S Alpha Design Technologies Private Limited Vs Mr Shivashankar G R

M/S. Mera Transport Exchange Private Limited Vs the Superintendent of Central Tax

M/S the Minawala Gems and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S United Breweries Holdings Limited