Disposed¶28

Smt Sahanaz Begum v. Smt Fathimun

Karnataka HC2 Jun 2025WP/3343/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Article 227 writ petition (GM-CPC); delayed challenge to interim temporary injunction order dated 28.04.2017 in OS.No.402/2013 (challenge made 19.10.2020); companion order dated 26.08.2020 in MA.No.64/2017; suit set down for final judgment 04.06.2025; petition held undeserving of entertainment and disposed of without interference; injunction left undisturbed; Justice M.Nagaprasanna; decided 02-06-2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the petition was disposed of without interfering with the orders challenged, so the prayer to quash the Annexure-E and Annexure-G orders was not acceded to. ¶28

Smt Sahanaz Begum Vs Smt Fathimun — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:18561 WP No. 3343 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.3343 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT.SAHANAZ BEGUM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O.MOHAMMED PEER @ BABU

¶8

SRI MOHAMMED PEER @ BABU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O.MOHAMMED IBRAHIM

¶9

BOTH ARE R/AT NO.978 WARD NO.3, RAGI MILL ROAD REVENUE LAYOUT BELAVATHA VILLAGE, RBI POST MYSURU-570 023

¶10

…PETITIONERS

¶11

(BY SRI P.NATARAJU, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

SMT.FATHIMUN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS W/O.SYED ISMAIL R/AT NO.34, 1^ST CROSS 2^ND STAGE, RAJIV NAGAR MYSURU-570 023

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI P.N.MANMOHAN, ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.04.2017 PASSED ON IA.NO.IV IN OS.NO.402/2013 BY ADDITIONAL II CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2020 PASSED IN MA.NO.64/2017 BY II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU VIDE ANNEXURE-G.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:18561 WP No. 3343 of 2021

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

The petitioners are before this Court calling in

¶25

question an order dated 28.04.2017 passed on an interlocutory application in OS.No.402/2013 granting temporary injunction in favour of the respondent-plaintiff.

¶26

Learned counsel for parties would submit that the

¶27

matter is now set down for judgment on 04.06.2025.

¶28

In that light and the order of temporary injunction dated 28.04.2017 being challenged only on 19.10.2020, the petition does not deserve any entertainment and it is thus disposed without interfering with the order challenged.

¶29

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶30

¶31

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71

Smt Sahanaz Begum v. Smt Fathimun

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sahanaz Begum v. Smt Fathimun

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Janatha Co. Op Bank Ltd. Vs Mr Kodandaramu R

Shanmukappa R Ballary Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Nuthan Prasad Vs State of Karnataka

Suresh Vs N Lakshman

Karavalli Bus Owners Association (R) Vs Union of India

Ms. Ashwini T Vs the Karnataka Lokayukta