T Siddaiah v. the Prl Secretary

Karnataka HC6 Nov 2025WP/33389/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; WP No. 33389 of 2025 (S-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:44847; T. Siddaiah v. Prl. Secretary Revenue Department and Deputy Commissioner Tumkur District; mandamus to consider representation dated 21.04.2025 for reappointment as First Division Assistant and financial benefits including pension; writ petition allowed; direction to pass appropriate order in accordance with law within two weeks; Justice Ashok S. Kinagi; decided 06-11-2025.

What did the court decide?

Mandamus issued: respondent No.2 directed to consider Annexure A (representation dated 21.04.2025) and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within two weeks from receipt of the copy of the order. ¶¶33

T Siddaiah Vs the Prl Secretary — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:44847 WP No. 33389 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 33389 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

T. SIDDAIAH S/O T.K. THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT SHIRA GATE BASAVANNANNAPALYA TUMKUR DISTRICT

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI. H PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY., ADV.)

¶14

AND:

¶15

THE PRL. SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001

¶16

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR-582101

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:44847 WP No. 33389 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SMT. B.SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA)

¶21

THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION EFFECTIVELY, MADE ON 21.04.2025 FOR REAPPOINTMENT OF PETITIONERS EARLIER POST AS FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT AND TO PROVIDE ALL FINANCIAL BENEFITS INCLUDING PENSION BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 21.04.2025 for reappointment of the petitioner's earlier post as First Division Assistant and to provide all financial benefits including pension benefits to the petitioner as per Annexure A.

¶26

NC: 2025:KHC:44847 WP No. 33389 of 2025

¶27

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate

¶30

submits that, if reasonable time is granted, respondent No.2 would consider and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

¶31

Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

¶32

ORDER

¶33

i. The writ petition is allowed .

¶34

ii. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider Annexure A and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶35

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶36

SSB

T Siddaiah v. the Prl Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T Siddaiah v. the Prl Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parimala Kalasapur Vs the Department of Primary and Secondary Education

Sri. Tharanath S. Rathod Vs State of Karnataka

Dr. Sanjay R P, Vs State of Karnataka

Smt. K. R. Rathnambika Vs the Under Secretary

Sri. Prabhakara T.C. Vs the Chief Executive Officer

Karunakara D Vs State of Karnataka