Dismissed¶25

Kaleemulla v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Jan 2025WP/29366/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as infructuous; challenge to municipal shop auction notice; Auction Notice No.PUPA/THA.SHA/CR/02/2024-25 dated 05.10.2024; Chief Officer, Pavagada Town Municipality; Shop No. 22 (formerly 32), Commercial Complex, Old Bus Stand, Pavagada; auction conducted before hearing and petitioner unsuccessful; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; WP No. 29366 of 2024 (LB-RES); Karnataka High Court, 24 January 2025; NC: 2025:KHC:3090.

What did the court decide?

Since the auction had been conducted before the hearing and the petitioner had participated unsuccessfully therein, the petition had become infructuous and was dismissed as such. ¶25

Kaleemulla Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3090 WP No. 29366 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 29366 OF 2024 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

KALEEMULLA S/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB SAB AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, FORMERLY FOOT WEAR MERCHANT AND NOW DOING TIFFIN CENTRE BUSINESS, R/AT 32-NOW 22, PAVAGADA MUNICIPAL COMMERCIAL COMPLEX SIRA ROAD, PAVAGADA TOWN PAVAGDA TALUK, TUMKUR DIST-561202

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. HARISH H V., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560001

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMKUR. TUMKURU DIST – 572101

¶15

THE CHIEF OFFICER PAVAGADA TOWN MUNICIPALITY, PAVAGADA, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 561202

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SMT. SPOORTHI.V., HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI. D.NAGARAJ., ADVOCATE FOR C/R-3)

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3090 WP No. 29366 of 2024

¶19

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE AUCTION NOTICE BEARING NO.PUPA/THA.SHA/CR/02/2024-25 DATED 05.10.2024 ISSUED BY R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A FOR CONDUCTING AUCTION OF THE SHOP NO. 22 (FORMERLY 32) OF COMMERCIAL COMPLEX SITUATED IN MUNICIPALITY, OLD BUS STAND, PAVAGADA TOWN, ETC.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

This petition has been filed challenging an auction which was to be conducted on 29.10.2024.

¶24

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the auction was conducted and in the said auction the petitioner had participated unsuccessfully.

¶25

In view of the above facts, it is obvious that the petition has become infructuous. Therefore, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶26

Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

¶27

GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Kaleemulla v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaleemulla v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Ganapathi Shastri H N Vs the Chief Executive Officer

Sri Ramachandra N Vs the Commissioner

Suraj Sur Vs the Commissioner

Smt Mala N Vs the Chief Commissioner

Ykc Media Vs State of Karnataka

Vananam Estate Private Limited Vs State of Karnataka