Allowed¶51

Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Kanakal v. Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Ltd.

Karnataka HC8 Oct 2025WP/27333/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, WP No. 27333 of 2025 (S-RES), decided 08.10.2025 by Justice Ashok S. Kinagi; compassionate appointment; writ of mandamus; Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; BESCOM (Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Ltd.), O&M Divisions Magadi and Kudur; deceased Assistant Lineman Sharanabasappa Kanakala (died 22.03.2023); petitioner Vijayalakshmi Kanakal; requisition/representation dated 15.05.2023; direction to consider requisition and pass appropriate order within eight weeks; writ petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Mandamus granted: respondents directed to consider the requisition vide Annexure-A dated 15.05.2023 and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within eight weeks from receipt of copy of the order. ¶51

Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Kanakal Vs Bengaluru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:39528 WP No. 27333 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 27333 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

MRS. VIJAYALAKSHMI KANAKAL

¶11

W/O SHARANABASAPPA KANAKAL AGE 25 YEARS R/AT BEHIND V.M HIGH SCHOOL, KANDAGANOOR POST, KANDAGANOOR, MUDDEBIHAL TALUK, VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT.

¶12

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI. PRANEETH G N., ADVOCATE) AND:

¶14

…PETITIONER

¶15

BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, O AND M DIVISION MAGADI- 562 120

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:39528 WP No. 27333 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O AND M DIVISION KUDUR,

¶20

BESCOM-561 101

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SMT. LIKITH R. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT AND APPOINT THE PETITIONER ON COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS IN PLACE OF HER DECEASED HUSBAND, LATE SHARANABASAPPA KANAKALA, FORTHWITH (AS PER ANNEXURE A) DATED 15.05.2023.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶26

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:39528 WP No. 27333 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds in place of her deceased husband, late Sharanabasappa Kanakala vide Annexure-A dated 15.05.2023.

¶31

Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:

¶32

The husband of the petitioner was employed as an Assistant Lineman in respondent company, Magadi Division. He passed away on 22.03.2023. On 15.05.2023, the petitioner submitted a requisition to the respondent's company seeking appointment on compassionate grounds. The respondents have not replied to the requisition submitted by the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition.

¶33

¶34

NC: 2025:KHC:39528 WP No. 27333 of 2025

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also

¶37

learned counsel for the respondents.

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a requisition for appointment on compassionate grounds in place of her deceased husband late Sharanabasappa Kanakala. The respondents have not passed any order on the requisition submitted by the petitioner. Hence, he submits that it is the legal duty on the part of the respondents to pass an appropriate order on the requisition. Hence, on these grounds, he prays to allow the writ petition.

¶39

Per contra , learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is granted to the respondents, the respondents would consider the application in accordance with law and pass appropriate order.

¶40

Perused the records and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.

¶41

5 - NC: 2025:KHC:39528 WP No. 27333 of 2025

¶42

HC-KAR

¶43

There is no dispute in regard to the deceased Sharanabasappa Kanakala was working in the respondent's company as an Assistant Lineman. He passed away on 22.03.2023. After the demise of Sharanabasappa Kanakala, the petitioner submitted a requisition for appointment on compassionate grounds in place of her deceased husband. The said requisition was submitted on 15.05.2023. The respondents till date have not considered the requisition.

¶44

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the reasonable time is granted to the respondents, the respondents would consider the application. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, I proceed to pass the following order:

¶45

ORDER

¶46

i. The writ petition is allowed .

¶47

¶48

NC: 2025:KHC:39528 WP No. 27333 of 2025

¶49

HC-KAR

¶50

ii. The respondents are directed to consider the

¶51

requisition of the petitioner vide Annexure-A dated 15.05.2023 and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶52

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶53

sks

¶54

CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Kanakal v. Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Kanakal v. Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Sharma Vs State by

Sri Venkataiah Vs Smt Basamma

Smt Prema Vs Sri S N Shivakumar

Kapinipathi Vs State of Karnataka

Dr. G M Kalleshwarappa @ G M K Eshwar Vs State of Karnataka

Sri C K Umesh Vs Smt Channamma