Dismissed¶¶25

Abhishek Sharma v. State by

Karnataka HC12 Sept 2025CRL.P/3165/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), CRL.P No. 3165 of 2020, Justice Ashok S. Kinagi, decided 12.09.2025: Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition filed 12.06.2020 by Abhishek Sharma to quash FIR Cr.No.101/2020 (offences initiated by respondent No.2 Gunjan Sharma) pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Bengaluru Rural District, by compounding the offences; dismissed purely on procedural grounds for non-compliance of office objection after peremptory warning of 24.06.2024; petitioner absent on the day of hearing.

What did the court decide?

On the case being called out none appeared for the petitioner, who had not complied with the office objection despite sufficient time; hence, in view of the peremptory order, the petition was dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. ¶¶25

Abhishek Sharma Vs State by — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:36442 CRL.P No. 3165 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3165 OF 2020

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

ABHISHEK SHARMA S/O JAY KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.E-901, KEERTHI GARDENIA NEXT TO VIBGYOR SCHOOL ROAD, THUBRAHALLI, BENGALURU-560066.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. SIJI MALAYIL, ADV. (absent))

¶10

AND:

¶11

STATE BY VARTHUR P S REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING CUBBONPARK, BANGALORE-560001.

¶12

GUNJAN SHARMA

¶13

MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR

¶14

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

W/O ABHISHEK SHARMA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.E-901, KEERTHI GARDENIA NEXT TO VIBGYOR SCHOOL ROAD, THUBRAHALLI, BENGALURU-560066.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1 R2 SERVED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE PRESENT PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.101/2020 BY COMPOUNDING THE OFFENCES INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:36442 CRL.P No. 3165 of 2020

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING AT DHARWAD BENCH THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)

¶23

This petition was filed on 12.06.2020 and notice was issued to respondent No.2.

¶24

Office has raised an objection. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied the office objection. The matter was listed before the Court on 24.06.2024 and two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objection, failing which, it was ordered that the petition would stands dismissed.

¶25

Case called out. None appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in complying with the office objections. Hence, in view of the peremptory order, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objection.

¶26

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶27

Kmv: CT: BSB

Abhishek Sharma v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Sharma v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Prema Vs Sri S N Shivakumar

Sri.S.v. Venkateshappa Vs Sri.Nagaraju

Sri Chandregowda S/O Late Kavallagowda Vs Sri Jayakumar Gowda B K @ Kamanna

Sri Venkataiah Vs Smt Basamma

Kapinipathi Vs State of Karnataka

Dr. G M Kalleshwarappa @ G M K Eshwar Vs State of Karnataka