Allowed¶33
Lakshmamma v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/26711/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regularization of unauthorized occupation; Form No.57 / Form No.53 application; inaction by Tahasildar, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapur District; direction to Committee; four-month timeline; Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; writ petition under KLR-RES; co-ordinate bench precedent W.P.No.22270/2023 dated 06.10.2023; petitioner Lakshamma; advocate Prasanna D P; AGA B.P.Radha; State of Karnataka, Department of Revenue.
What did the court decide?
Committee comprising respondent No.3 - Tahasildar directed to decide the application filed in Form No.53 strictly adhering to the requisite conditions of unauthorized occupation, within four months from receipt of order copy. ¶33