Sri Kempasingegowda v. Smt Mynavathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), WP No. 23945 of 2024 (GM-CPC), NC: 2025:KHC:30178, decided 04.08.2025 by M.Nagaprasanna J. Article 227 petition by Kempasingegowda against respondents Mynavathi, Manjula, Girija, H.S.Nataraj, and Rajamma (LR of deceased H.S. Somegowda), praying to quash order dt. 09.02.2024 in FDP No. 10/2019 (Prl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru, Annx-D). Counsel submitted the petition was infructuous due to efflux of time; petition disposed as infructuous. No merits adjudicated; no cases or other statutes cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The court took on record learned counsel's submission that the petition is rendered infructuous due to efflux of time, and disposed of the writ petition as having become infructuous; no adjudication was made on the merits of the prayer to quash the FDP order.