Disposed¶58

Smt. Lakshmamma v. M/S. Inspira Builders LLP

Karnataka HC18 Aug 2025WP/22795/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 writ petition (GM-CPC), WP No. 22795 of 2025, High Court of Karnataka (M. Nagaprasanna J., 18.08.2025): time-bound disposal sought of I.A. No. 2/2025 for vacation of ex parte interim order in commercial suit COM.OS. No. 481/2025 before City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore (Commercial Court); respondent M/s. Inspira Builders LLP; court directs disposal within four weeks; writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to dispose I.A. No. 2/2025 (vacation of the ex parte interim order in COM.OS. No. 481/2025) within an outer limit of four weeks from receipt of copy of the order, if not earlier. ¶58

Smt. Lakshmamma Vs M/S. Inspira Builders LLP — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:32006 WP No. 22795 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 22795 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE L.DODDASIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶9

(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED).

¶10

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

SMT. D.AMARAVATHI, D/O LATE L.DODDASIDDA REDDY, W/O SRINIVAS V., AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.231, 10^TH CROSS, NEAR KARNATAKA FLAG POLE, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU – 560 103.

¶12

SRI. D.PRAKASH, S/O LATE L.DODDASIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶13

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:32006 WP No. 22795 of 2025

¶14

HC-KAR

¶15

P.CHANDAN,

¶16

AGE: MINOR, S/O SRI. D.PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER SRI. D.PRAKASH, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶17

P.VARSHINI, AGE: MINOR, D/O SRI. D.PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER SRI D.PRAKASH, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶18

SRI. D.PRATISH, S/O LATE L.DODDASIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶19

SRI. ADITHYA P.REDDY,

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC:32006 WP No. 22795 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

S/O SRI. D.PRATEESH, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶24

SMT. D.PAVITHRA, D/O LATE L.DODDA SIDDA REDDY, W/O M.SURESHA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.538, 4^TH CROSS, AYYAPPA LAYOUT MUNNEKOLALA, MARTHAHALLI COLONY, BENGALURU – 560 037.

¶25

SRI. D.THILAK, S/O LATE L.DODDASIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶26

YAMANI T.REDDY, AGE: MINOR, D/O SRI. D.THILAK, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER SRI D.THILAK, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM,

¶27

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:32006 WP No. 22795 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶30

NIHARIKA T.REDDY, AGE: MINOR, D/O SRI. D.THILAK, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER SRI. D.THILAK, RESIDING AT NO.131, NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE, DODDAKANNALLI CARMELARAM, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 035.

¶31

…PETITIONERS

¶32

(BY SRI. VENKATESH N., ADVOCATE)

¶33

AND:

¶34

M/S. INSPIRA BUILDERS LLP, REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR. ARVIND M.S., OFFICE AT NO.255, 36^TH CROSS, 5^TH MAIN, 4^TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 011.

¶35

ALSO AT NO.35, GROUND FLOOR, KASTURBA CROSS ROAD, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 011, REP. BY HIS PARTNER MR. ARVIND M.S.

¶36

…RESPONDENT

¶37

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE HON’BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BANGALORE

¶38

¶39

NC: 2025:KHC:32006 WP No. 22795 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

(COMMERCIAL COURT CCH-LXXXVIII ACC & SJ, CCH-89 BENGALURU) IN COM.OS. NO. 481/2025 TO HEAR AND DISPOSE IA NO.2/2025 WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ORDER OF THIS HON’BLE COURT AT ANNEXURE – A AND ETC.

¶42

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶43

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶44

ORAL ORDER

¶45

Petitioners are before this Court seeking the following

¶46

prayers:

¶47

“a) To Grant an or order or Writ directing the Hon'ble City Civil And Sessions Judge At Bangalore (Commercial Court CCH-LXXXVIII ACC & SJ, CCH89 Bengaluru, in COM.OS. No. 481/2025 to hear and dispose IA No. 2/2025 within 30 days from the date of order of this Hon'ble Court at Annexure-A.

¶48

b) To grant such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the above case.”

¶49

Heard Sri.Venkatesh N, learned counsel appearing

¶50

for the petitioners and have perused the material on record.

¶51

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he

¶52

has filed an application seeking vacation of the ex parte interim order granted by the concerned Court and said application is said to be pending consideration.

¶53

¶54

NC: 2025:KHC:32006 WP No. 22795 of 2025

¶55

HC-KAR

¶56

In the light of the said submission and the prayer being innocuous, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to dispose the application seeking vacation of the interim order on I.A.No.2/2025 filed by the present petitioners within

¶57

an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, if not earlier.

¶58

Ordered accordingly and Writ Petition is disposed .

¶59

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶60

CBC

¶61

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 309

Smt. Lakshmamma v. M/S. Inspira Builders LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Lakshmamma v. M/S. Inspira Builders LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Muralidhara Krishnappa Vs Income Tax Officer

M/S Saraswathi Enterprises, Vs Joint/ Additional Commissioner of Central Tax

Ismail Vs State of Karnataka

Shri Yogeesh Vs Shri T P G Rajith Rudra

Smt Shobha Vs Sri Nagendra Naik

M/S Neycer Electricals Pvt. Vs National Institute of Fasion Technology